2016
DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20150996
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Emergency radiology: straightening of the cervical spine in MDCT after trauma—a sign of injury or normal variant?

Abstract: Straightening of the C-spine alignment in MDCT alone is not a definitive sign of injury. Straightening of the C-spine alignment is related to neck positioning and active patient control. CCI has a straightening effect on the cervical alignment.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Data from Marshall [42], for example, provide evidence that patients involved in an MVC injury have a 10 • mean reduction in the C1-C7 Cobb angle of cervical lordosis compared to a control group. Complicating matters is that conflicting results have been reported whereby the relationship of altered cervical curvatures to prognostic outcomes following exposure to an MVC (both short-and long-term) has been refuted [43][44][45][46]. Still, according to our review, the majority of the literature indicates that patients with injuries resulting from an MVC have a significantly greater frequency and magnitude of altered cervical curve configurations [15][16][17][18][19][20][21]23,42].…”
Section: Loss Of Lordosis In Mvc Populationsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Data from Marshall [42], for example, provide evidence that patients involved in an MVC injury have a 10 • mean reduction in the C1-C7 Cobb angle of cervical lordosis compared to a control group. Complicating matters is that conflicting results have been reported whereby the relationship of altered cervical curvatures to prognostic outcomes following exposure to an MVC (both short-and long-term) has been refuted [43][44][45][46]. Still, according to our review, the majority of the literature indicates that patients with injuries resulting from an MVC have a significantly greater frequency and magnitude of altered cervical curve configurations [15][16][17][18][19][20][21]23,42].…”
Section: Loss Of Lordosis In Mvc Populationsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Data from Marshall and Tuchin [39], for example, provides evidence that patients involved in a MVC injury have a 10° mean reduction in the C1-C7 Cobb angle of cervical lordosis compared to a control group. Complicating matters is that conflicting results have been reported whereby the relationship of altered cervical curvatures to prognostic outcomes following exposure to an MVC (both short and long-term) has been refuted [40][41][42][43]. Still, according to our review, the majority of the literature indicates that patients with injuries resulting from an MVC have a significantly greater frequency and magnitude of altered cervical curve configurations [15][16][17][18][19][20][21]23,39].…”
Section: Loss Of Lordosis In Mvc Populationsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…In addition, physical or medical constraints may prevent patients from being in an upright position. Second, retrospective analysis using supine MRI or CT images may be the only option [ 6 , 7 , 8 ]. Other than these situations, a clinician should at least keep in mind that upright radiography cannot be completely replaced by supine MRI, and that the assessment of cervical alignment based on MRI measurements may be inaccurate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although radiography with the patient in an upright position is considered the standard method for assessing sagittal cervical alignment [ 5 ], cervical alignment is frequently determined, or reported, based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or computed tomography (CT), performed on subjects in a supine position [ 6 , 7 , 8 ]. However, the difference in the patient positioning and the use of a head stabilizer during MRI scanning may affect cervical alignment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%