Emergent Concepts on Knowledge Intensive Processes

Aranda-Corral, Gonzalo A.; Borrego-Dí­az, Joaquín; Galán-Páez, Juan; Jiménez-Mavillard, Antonio

doi:10.1007/978-3-319-11289-3_29

Cited by 2 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 16 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…For example, it is interesting to compare the ontology with the Security Ontology (SO) 5 from Herzog et al [16]. This ontology and the ontological elements, created during the strategy, complement each other with features as risk identification (from ours to the SO) and countermeasures analysis (from the SO to ours).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The main reason for discarding it is that the proposed strategy is KE oriented, thus the inclusion of a relevant number of external concepts would distort the proper process of KE. A more suitable approach would be to assist the strategy with collaborative documentation tools from Knowledge Intensive Process (see Aranda-Corral et al's works [4,5]). These tools bridge the knowledge gap between SWT experts and SIS experts.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Semantics for incident identification and resolution reports

et al. 2016

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In order to achieve a safe and systematic treatment of security protocols, organizations release a number of technical briefings describing how to detect and manage security incidents. A critical issue is that this document set may suffer from semantic deficiencies, mainly due to ambiguity or different granularity levels of description and analysis. An approach to face this problem is the use of semantic methodologies in order to provide better Knowledge Externalization from incident protocols management. In this article, we propose a method based on semantic techniques for both, analyzing and specifying (meta)security requirements on protocols used for solving security incidents. This would allow specialist getting better documentation on their intangible knowledge about them.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%