2021
DOI: 10.1101/2021.07.15.452569
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Emergent evolutionary forces in spatial models of microbial growth in the human gut microbiota

Abstract: The genetic composition of the gut microbiota is constantly reshaped by ecological and evolutionary forces. These strain-level dynamics can be challenging to understand because they emerge from complex spatial growth processes that take place within a host. Here we introduce a mathematical framework to predict how stochastic evolutionary forces emerge from simple models of microbial growth in the intestinal lumen. Our framework shows how fluid flow and longitudinal variation in growth rate combine to shape the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 83 publications
2
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This rate can also be expressed as the active population size divided by the minimal replication time τ rep , because bacteria in the active population reproduce at rates close to the maximal one. Thus, the ratio of active to total population size is equal to the ratio of minimal replication time to renewal time, which, as discussed in previous section, can be as small as 20/(24 × 60) = 1.4 × 10 −2 , and is likely to be of order 0.1 (also consistent with [64]). In addition, fixation of a mutant occurs within a strain.…”
Section: S11 Relevance Of Neutral Mutationssupporting
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This rate can also be expressed as the active population size divided by the minimal replication time τ rep , because bacteria in the active population reproduce at rates close to the maximal one. Thus, the ratio of active to total population size is equal to the ratio of minimal replication time to renewal time, which, as discussed in previous section, can be as small as 20/(24 × 60) = 1.4 × 10 −2 , and is likely to be of order 0.1 (also consistent with [64]). In addition, fixation of a mutant occurs within a strain.…”
Section: S11 Relevance Of Neutral Mutationssupporting
confidence: 69%
“…Note. While this manuscript was in revision, an independent and complementary study [64] was released on BioRxiv.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many gut commensals are known to engage in conjugative transfer, both in vitro and in vivo [77]. However, the time required for bacterial conjugation carries a substantial opportunity cost in the high growth regimes of the large intestine, and would need to be ameliorated by a corresponding fitness benefit or residence in a privileged spatial location [78]. Moreover, we observe little correlation between the overall rates of recombination in different species and their frequency of apparent multi-colonization (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3D range from 0.01 – 1, with most species clustering near r/μ ~0.1. Using estimates of the remaining parameters from the existing literature [ N ~ 10 13 – 10 14 [95], μ ~ 10 −10 – 10 −9 [96], L ~ 10 6.5 [97], Δ t ~ 1 – 10 [78, 98]], we expect that a moderately abundant species ( f ~ 3–30%) will produce anywhere from 10 6 to 10 12 recombinant offspring each day.…”
Section: Text Supplemental Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hundreds to thousands of species continually reproduce in a typical host, dynamics that culminate in the acquisition of ∼ 10 9 de novo mutations each day [1]. Due to the comparatively brief generation time of microbes in the human gut [2], those mutations that are beneficial can rapidly fix on a timescale of days to months [1,[3][4][5][6][7][8]. Such evolutionary dynamics have the capacity to alter the genetic composition of a species within a given host.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%