The first decade of the twenty-first century brought with it multiple
crises: food crisis, energy crisis, financial crisis and the crisis caused by
climate changes. As one of the responses to this multiple crises, the
process of buying/leasing large land areas, predominantly (but not
exclusively) in the global South, by Western corporations and funds, as well
as by governments of the certain countries whose economic power was on the
rise (China, the Gulf states, etc). Given that these large investments in
land oftern brought with them certain negative consequences, both for small
farmers in the host coutries and for the environment, the process quickly
became known as land grabbing. The first reactions came, as usual, from the
media, always in search of sensations, and from a number of non-governmental
organizations. When scientific circles began to consider the process of land
grabbing, there was a division among scientists into two approaches. We call
the first of them neoliberal, due to its economic character and insistence
on the key role of the market. The second approach, which we call
conflictual, dominates the universities; here we find much more complex
consideration of the process in question. Both scientific approaches are
closely related to the advocacy of certain policies, that is, political
responses to land grabbing. The presentation and analysis of two approaches
are not goals in themselves, but should help us understand/explain the role
and position of Serbia in this global process.