2011
DOI: 10.1177/1354067x11398312
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Emergent organization in the dialogical self: Evolution of a ‘‘both’’ ethnic identity position

Abstract: Dialogical self theory, based on principles of self-organizing systems, provides a framework within which diverse views regarding identity creation can be reconciled. The framework encompasses the relatively stable and coherent identity story as well as the more variable, contextually specific identity positionings. We illustrate how these dialogical self processes work together in the identity narration of a young woman who is second-generation Asian Indian, in particular: (a) the context (frame of reference)… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
25
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This can lead to multivoicedness and identity hybridity (Bell & Das, 2011), so that acculturation is not just a process of moving from one culture to another, but is rather a process of appropriating several cultural positions within one's sense of self (Bhatia & Ram, 2001.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This can lead to multivoicedness and identity hybridity (Bell & Das, 2011), so that acculturation is not just a process of moving from one culture to another, but is rather a process of appropriating several cultural positions within one's sense of self (Bhatia & Ram, 2001.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has guided real-time microgenetic analyses of emergent self-meanings (Bell & Das, 2011;Cunha, 2007), research on the processes of change in therapy settings extending over several months , and longer-term studies as in this analysis. It can be applied in single-occasion retrospective accounts of identity change (Baron, Bell, Corson, Kostina-Ritchey, and Frederick, 2012), although, as in any study of development, evaluations over time provide more detailed information about processes.…”
Section: Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Social normativity of such guidance for personal identity development leads to the hierarchical nature of the identity structures that emerge in that process. Looking at hierarchical order in identity processes can be theoretically productive (Bell & Das, 2011, p. 245)—here, the question of identity becomes that of dialogical self. A juxtaposition of “I-as-X” (“Indian”) with “I-as-Y” (“American”) creates a personal dialogue that can led to “I-as-both X and Y”—the minimum hierarchical organization of self-identity (hyphenated identity—Ali & Sonn, 2010).…”
Section: Struggling With the Identity Of Identitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Collective interest in Culture & Psychology in the Dialogical Self Theory (DST) has continued since these early presences of Hermans’ ideas in the Journal. All in all 226 articles have over the years dealt with various issues of Hermans’ innovation, pushing it in both theoretical directions and bringing in interesting empirical phenomena (Bell & Das, 2011; Carriere, 2018; Grinell, 2018).…”
Section: From Categories To Dialogues: a Fundamental Innovationmentioning
confidence: 99%