2023
DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2022.0511
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Emergent social structure is typically not associated with survival in a facultatively social mammal

Abstract: For social animals, group social structure has important consequences for disease and information spread. While prior studies showed individual connectedness within a group has fitness consequences, less is known about the fitness consequences of group social structure for the individuals who comprise the group. Using a long-term dataset on a wild population of facultatively social yellow-bellied marmots ( Marmota flaviventer ), we showed social structure had largely no relationship wit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 109 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Further, only clustering coefficient and embeddedness were observed to have statistically significant differences in beta diversity, suggesting microbe presence and relative differences may explain some variation in social network position. These results suggest that there is a contributing factor of phylogenetic microbial diversity that may have important consequences for sociality, possibly contributing to fitness in this species [ 41 , 42 , 44 47 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Further, only clustering coefficient and embeddedness were observed to have statistically significant differences in beta diversity, suggesting microbe presence and relative differences may explain some variation in social network position. These results suggest that there is a contributing factor of phylogenetic microbial diversity that may have important consequences for sociality, possibly contributing to fitness in this species [ 41 , 42 , 44 47 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Marmots are a good natural model to address the sociality-microbiome relationship due to their natural social variability and an available half-decade dataset consisting of individual social observations and microbial samples. Moreover, extensive studies have identified associations between social attributes and marmot fitness (survival: [41][42][43], alarm call propensity: [44], reproductive success: [45,46], and longevity: [47]), providing a strong foundation for exploring the sociality-microbiome relationship through a structured, exploratory analysis. While the direction of causality is difficult to determine, experimental evidence in laboratory rodent systems shows that changes in gut microbial abundance results in changes in social behaviour (reviewed in [10,16]), bolstering support for studying this direction of this relationship in our wild rodent system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The exclusion of undirected interactions or between unidentified individuals should not significantly influence social network measures [ 49 ]. The relatively low rate of unknown individuals in our observations [ 50 ], which occurred over the entire active season of these marmots, facilitates the reliability of our social network measure [ 49 , 51 , 52 ]. From these antagonistic networks, we calculated the GRC for groups of three or more adult females because GRC cannot be calculated for groups of two (electronic supplementary material, figure S1; code available on OSF [ 53 ]).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Decreased sensitivity: Gregarious species living in large groups [122][123][124]. Social species residing in more connected, reciprocal, and socially homogeneous groups [19,[125][126][127].…”
Section: Social Organizationmentioning
confidence: 99%