As
with other electron counting rules, the 18-n rule
of transition metal–main group (T–E) intermetallics
offers a variety of potential interatomic connectivity patterns for
any given electron count. What leads a compound to prefer one structure
over others that satisfy this rule? Herein, we investigate this question
as it relates to the two polymorphs of IrIn3: the high-temperature
CoGa3-type and the low-temperature IrIn3-type
forms. DFT-reversed approximation Molecular Orbital analysis reveals
that both structures can be interpreted in terms of the 18-n rule but with different electron configurations. In the
IrIn3 type, the Ir atoms obtain largely independent 18-electron
configurations, while in the CoGa3 type, Ir–Ir isolobal
bonds form as 1 electron/Ir atom is transferred to In–In interactions.
The presence of a deep pseudogap for the CoGa3 type, but
not for the IrIn3 type, suggests that it is electronically
preferred. DFT-Chemical Pressure (CP) analysis shows that atomic packing
provides another distinction between the structures. While both involve
tensions between positive Ir–In CPs and negative In–In
CPs, which call for the expansion and contraction of the structures,
respectively, their distinct spatial arrangements create very different
situations. In the CoGa3 type, the positive CPs create
a framework that holds open large void spaces for In-based electrons
(a scenario suitable for relatively small T atoms), while in the IrIn3 type the pressures are more homogenously distributed (a better
solution for relatively large T atoms). The open spaces in the CoGa3 type result in quadrupolar CP features, a hallmark of low-frequency
phonon modes and suggestive of higher vibrational entropy. Indeed,
phonon band structure calculations for the two IrIn3 polymorphs
indicate that the phase transition between them can largely be attributed
to the entropic stabilization of the CoGa3-type phase due
to soft motions associated with its CP quadrupoles. These CP-driven
effects illustrate how the competition between global and local packing
can shape how a structure realizes the 18-n rule
and how the temperature can influence this balance.