“…The National Alliance to End Homelessness recognizes differences in homelessness in different geographies, as outlined in their Geography of Homelessness report (2009) and researchers have concluded that attention to differential geographies is essential to understanding subpopulations of homelessness (Cloke et al, 2001; DeVerteuil, May, & Mahs, 2009; Lawrence, 1995; Parr, Stevenson, Fyfe, & Woolnough, 2015). Accordingly, researchers have recently applied a human geographical approach to begin to add to the homelessness literature in the areas of risk assessment (Reilly, 1994), social networks (Rowe & Wolch, 1990), perceptions of time and space (Van Doorn, 2010), and an integrated multidisciplinary model to further research in this special area (Williams & Sheehan, 2015). To accommodate the themes of time and space that emerged from our data, we similarly applied a time–space geography theoretical framework.…”