2022
DOI: 10.1007/s12144-022-03322-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Emerging adults facing the COVID-19 pandemic: emotion dysregulation, mentalizing, and psychological symptoms

Abstract: Settled in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, the present short-term longitudinal study aims to investigate the relation between emotion dysregulation, mentalizing (both certainty and uncertainty about mental states), and psychological symptoms in a sample of 83 emerging adults (Mage = 22.18 years, SD = 4.36) over a continuous period started with COVID-19 spreads. Results display significant positive associations between psychological symptoms and both emotion dysregulation and uncertainty about mental stat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
2
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The utilization of clinical measures of Anxiety, Depression, and BPD enabled us to investigate differences in RFQ-31 scores, as well as differences in ET, ER, AttS, and PM scores, across groups formed according to cut-off scores. Consistent with relevant literature [ 6 14 ], our results highlight the significant influence of excessive certainty, interest/curiosity, and uncertainty/confusion in distinguishing between BPD groups, and underscore the crucial role of uncertainty/confusion across all three clinical measures. Aligning with previous findings [ 28 ], our study underscores the inability of trust as a construct to differentiate groups across conditions of anxiety, depression, and BPD.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The utilization of clinical measures of Anxiety, Depression, and BPD enabled us to investigate differences in RFQ-31 scores, as well as differences in ET, ER, AttS, and PM scores, across groups formed according to cut-off scores. Consistent with relevant literature [ 6 14 ], our results highlight the significant influence of excessive certainty, interest/curiosity, and uncertainty/confusion in distinguishing between BPD groups, and underscore the crucial role of uncertainty/confusion across all three clinical measures. Aligning with previous findings [ 28 ], our study underscores the inability of trust as a construct to differentiate groups across conditions of anxiety, depression, and BPD.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The validity of the RFQ-31 is substantiated further by its associations with measures of Epistemic Trust, Attachment styles, Emotion Regulation, and Psychological Mindedness, further strengthened by the validation of all the aforementioned instruments in our Greek sample. Consistent with the existing literature, the uncertainty/confusion dimension demonstrates significant and strong correlations with the variables examined in this study [ 4 6 , 20 , 21 , 28 , 92 ]. Perhaps less surprisingly, excessive certainty does not correlate with mistrust and suppression, potentially due to a lack of well-modulated doubt about the minds of oneself and others.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation