Growing toxicologic evidence suggests that emerging perfluoroalkyl
substances (PFASs), like chlorinated polyfluoroalkyl ether sulfonate
(Cl-PFESA), may be as toxic or more toxic than perfluorooctanesulfonate
(PFOS) and perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA). However, further investigations
are needed in terms of the human health risk assessment. This study
examined the effects of emerging and legacy PFAS exposure on newborn
thyroid homeostasis and compared the thyroid disruption caused by
6:2 Cl-PFESA and PFOS using a benchmark dose approach. The health
effects of mixture and individual exposure were estimated using the
partial least-squares (PLS) model and linear regression, respectively.
A Bayesian benchmark dose (BMD) analysis determined the BMD value
for adverse effect comparison between 6:2 Cl-PFESA and PFOS. The median
(interquartile range) concentrations of 6:2 Cl-PFESA (0.573 [0.351–0.872]
ng/mL), PFOS (0.674 [0.462–1.007] ng/mL), and PFOA (1.457 [1.034,
2.405] ng/mL) were found to be similar. The PLS model ranked the PFAS
variables’ importance in projection (VIP) scores as follows:
6:2 Cl-PFESA > PFOS > PFOA. Linear regression showed that 6:2
Cl-PFESA
had a positive association with free triiodothyronine (FT3, P = 0.006) and triiodothyronine (T3, P =
0.014), while PFOS had a marginally significant positive association
with FT3 alone (P = 0.042). The BMD analysis indicated
that the estimated BMD10 for 6:2 Cl-PFESA (1.01 ng/mL)
was lower than that for PFOS (1.66 ng/mL) in relation to a 10% increase
in FT3. These findings suggest that 6:2 Cl-PFESA, an alternative to
PFOS, has a more pronounced impact on newborns’ thyroid homeostasis
compared to PFOS and other legacy PFASs.