2006
DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-06-0791
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Emerging Biology of Malignant Salivary Gland Tumors Offers New Insights into the Classification and Treatment of Mucoepidermoid Cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, the same CRTC1/MAML2 fusion gene was also detected in a Warthin's tumor with a t(11;19) translocation and in a clear cell hidradenoma of skin (Behboudi et al, 2005;El-Naggar, 2006). These findings raise the issue of tumor specificity and the possible histogenetic and biological effect of this event in the development of these entities (El-Naggar, 2006;Kaye, 2006). More recently, clinicopathologic studies of MECs have reported a restricted detection of the fusion transcript to the low-grade phenotype implying that this alteration imparts differentiation arrest and benign clinical behavior (Martins et al, 2004;Behboudi et al, 2006;Okabe et al, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Interestingly, the same CRTC1/MAML2 fusion gene was also detected in a Warthin's tumor with a t(11;19) translocation and in a clear cell hidradenoma of skin (Behboudi et al, 2005;El-Naggar, 2006). These findings raise the issue of tumor specificity and the possible histogenetic and biological effect of this event in the development of these entities (El-Naggar, 2006;Kaye, 2006). More recently, clinicopathologic studies of MECs have reported a restricted detection of the fusion transcript to the low-grade phenotype implying that this alteration imparts differentiation arrest and benign clinical behavior (Martins et al, 2004;Behboudi et al, 2006;Okabe et al, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…RT-PCR is considered preferable to conventional cytogenetic analysis in this regard, but is hampered by poor tissue fixation in the paraffin embedded sections [12]. The translocation is more commonly observed in RNA obtained from snap-frozen samples as compared to formalin-fixed tissue which suggests that even adequately fixed specimens may show false negativity due to technical reasons [13]. The specimen in our case was properly fixed and did not need decalcification, however the need for decalcification in most of the central MECs may also similarly impinge on the results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Crtc1-Maml2 fusion transcript was subsequently identified in primary thyroid, breast, cervix, lung and cutaneous sweat gland tumors with clear-cell, mucoepidermoid tumor-like histological features (Enlund et al, 2004;Behboudi et al, 2005;Kazakov et al, 2007;Tirado et al, 2007;Achcar et al, 2009;Camelo-Piragua et al, 2009;Kaye, 2009;Lennerz et al, 2009) unifying a group of tumors that arise from mucous/serous glands scattered throughout the body. As Crtc gene members are potent cAMP/CREB co-activators (Conkright et al, 2003;Iourgenko et al, 2003) and the ectopic expression of Crtc1-Maml2 activated a similar group of target genes (Coxon et al, 2005;Wu et al, 2005), a current model proposes that the fusion oncogene transforms cells by aberrantly co-activating specific Crtc1-inducible targets (Kaye, 2006). For example, using a doxycycline inducible Crtc1-Maml2 vector system we identified marked induction of previously known cAMP target genes, such as PEPCK, amphiregulin, NR4A2 and NR4A3 (Coxon et al, 2005), which corresponded to the prototypic gene promoters activated by wild-type Crtc1 (Conkright et al, 2003;Iourgenko et al, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%