Emerging Class Relations in the Mekong River Delta of Vietnam: A Network Analysis

Abstract

Neoclassical theory has not succeeded in explaining the relationship between increasing landlessness and class differentiation in rural southern Vietnam. In this paper, we take a relational approach, using statistical techniques from social network theory, to examine the governance structure of markets in a commune of Tra Vinh province in the Mekong River Delta. We demonstrate that new opportunities provided by the process of market development are accessible only to those households controlling the right bundles of resources in the core agricultural production and trading system of the area. Further, industrial employment is available only to those who have, at some stage, controlled land, while those who have never participated in the land and rice markets are confined to casual agricultural labour. The governance structure, embedded informally in relatively stable market networks, therefore reproduces class divisions.

How Institutions Influence SME Innovation and Networking Practices: The Case of Vietnamese Agribusiness

“…The Vietnamese animal feed industry is embedded in the agribusiness sector, the leading export sector (Prota and Beresford ). The AFF has developed rapidly, with an average growth rate of 16.6 percent per year since 2000 (Pham et al.…”

From Food Crisis to Agrarian Crisis? Food Security Strategy and Rural Livelihoods in Vietnam

“…as fewer and fewer households are involved in agriculture itself, even as the overall output and cultivated area increase), there occurs a concomitant process, also widely discussed in the field of agrarian studies, of concentration and accumulation, especially of land. Such a phenomenon has been widely observed in Vietnam over the past two decades, and has been especially pronounced in the Mekong Delta (Akram-Lodhi 2005;Prota and Beresford 2012;Gorman 2014).…”

Moral Economy and the Upper Peasant: The Dynamics of Land Privatization in the Mekong Delta

“…These inequalities intensified in the post‐reform period, as those landowning farmers endowed with the ‘resources with which to respond to favourable market conditions’ were able to expand and accumulate (Ngo Vinh Long , 184; Dang Phong ). As Prota and Beresford () argue, access to land has been a necessary, but not sufficient, means of achieving upward social mobility among peasant producers in the Mekong Delta; those who were not allocated land in the privatization process (or had their holdings taken away from them for restitution to former owners), they find, were far more likely than their counterparts to experience negative social mobility. Among those who experienced partial, but not complete dispossession as a result of the restitution process, the results have been similar.…”