Emerging Evidence of Translational Control by AU-Rich Element-Binding Proteins

Abstract

RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) are key regulators of posttranscriptional gene expression and control many important biological processes including cell proliferation, development, and differentiation. RBPs bind specific motifs in their target mRNAs and regulate mRNA fate at many steps. The AU-rich element (ARE) is one of the major cis-regulatory elements in the 3′ untranslated region (UTR) of labile mRNAs. Many of these encode factors requiring very tight regulation, such as inflammatory cytokines and growth factors. Disruption in the control of these factors’ expression can cause autoimmune diseases, developmental disorders, or cancers. Therefore, these mRNAs are strictly regulated by various RBPs, particularly ARE-binding proteins (ARE-BPs). To regulate mRNA metabolism, ARE-BPs bind target mRNAs and affect some factors on mRNAs directly, or recruit effectors, such as mRNA decay machinery and protein kinases to target mRNAs. Importantly, some ARE-BPs have stabilizing roles, whereas others are destabilizing, and ARE-BPs appear to compete with each other when binding to target mRNAs. The function of specific ARE-BPs is modulated by posttranslational modifications (PTMs) including methylation and phosphorylation, thereby providing a means for cellular signaling pathways to regulate stability of specific target mRNAs. In this review, we summarize recent studies which have revealed detailed molecular mechanisms of ARE-BP-mediated regulation of gene expression and also report on the importance of ARE-BP function in specific physiological contexts and how this relates to disease. We also propose an mRNP regulatory network based on competition between stabilizing ARE-BPs and destabilizing ARE-BPs.

On the Way to Understanding the Interplay between the RNA Structure and Functions in Cells: A Genome-Wide Perspective

“…The direct influence of the structural elements within 3 UTRs on translation remains incompletely discovered, and these structures are usually explored in the context of RNA stability (see below). Nevertheless, the RNA stability and translation efficiency are undeniably inseparable and very often, factors, including 3 UTR binding proteins that control transcript stability and decay, are also engaged in TE regulation [61][62][63].…”

Integrated Analysis of the Functions and Prognostic Values of RNA Binding Proteins in Lung Squamous Cell Carcinoma

“…RNA binding proteins (RBPs) are proteins that interact with various types of RNA and are ubiquitously expressed in cells (Masuda and Kuwano, 2019;New et al, 2019;Otsuka et al, 2019). A total of 1542 RBPs have been identified by highthroughput screening in human cells, representing 7.5% of all protein coding genes (Gerstberger et al, 2014).…”

Revisiting the Concept of Stress in the Prognosis of Solid Tumors: A Role for Stress Granules Proteins?

“…Increasing the translation rate of the mRNA encoding a SGs protein would be more efficient than producing more mRNAs. This could be done by specific signal in the non-translated region of the mRNA such as AU-rich element (ARE) [ 153 ] or to the length of the mRNA as it was already described [ 154 ]. Favoring translation over transcription is perhaps also a mechanism allowing an economy of energy in cancer cells ( Figure 4 ).…”