2002
DOI: 10.1016/s1532-0464(02)00009-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Emerging paradigms of cognition in medical decision-making

Abstract: The limitations of the classical or traditional paradigm of decision research are increasingly apparent, even though there has been a substantial body of empirical research on medical decision-making over the past 40 years. As decision-support technology continues to proliferate in medical settings, it is imperative that "basic science" decision research develop a broader-based and more valid foundation for the study of medical decision-making as it occurs in the natural setting. This paper critically reviews … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
212
0
4

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 267 publications
(222 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
1
212
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Echoing the findings of Patel et al in the literature, 24 there appeared to be widespread recognition of the complexity of factors involved in making a 'good' decision.…”
Section: Comparison With Existing Literaturementioning
confidence: 95%
“…Echoing the findings of Patel et al in the literature, 24 there appeared to be widespread recognition of the complexity of factors involved in making a 'good' decision.…”
Section: Comparison With Existing Literaturementioning
confidence: 95%
“…Vignettes examine complex decisions where in situ methods (e.g. think-aloud protocols) are less practical, and are used extensively in NDM research (Jacklin et al 2008;Patel, Kaufman, and Arocha 2002;Reyna and Lloyd 2006).…”
Section: Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…information, scenario detail) leading to this decision; ○ Influence of organisational factors (e.g. protocols, norms) underlying decision-making; (Bertsimas, Farias, and Trichakis 2012;Pauker and Kassirer 1975), framing effects upon decision-making (Croskerry 2002;Fackler et al 2009;Kahneman, Slovic, and Tversky 1982), experience and expertise (Flin, Youngson, and Yule 2007;Klein 1993;Patel, Kaufman, and Arocha 2002), and organisational and group norms for decision-making (Eisenberg 1979;Gore et al 2006). Finally, the themes and data from the qualitative analysis were summarised and synthesised into a single table, which aimed to provide an initial conceptual set (illustrated by examples) of factors influencing how clinicians make risk trade-offs in ICU.…”
Section: Interview Protocolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, problem-solving studies are more operational in formalizing latent sources of error as well as describing the root causes of problems or events. Besides, experienced knowledge differs in important respects from intermediate knowledge and has a qualitatively distinct engagement with differential use of reasoning strategies in problem solving: for example, experts are involved in the process of situation assessment with a data-driven reasoning whereas the novices and intermediates are much more proactive in handling solution options and organizing further investigations with a hypothesis-driven reasoning (Patel, Kaufman, & Arocha, 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%