Emerging Technologies Research in Accounting: JETA's First Decade

Abstract

The Journal of Emerging Technologies in Accounting (JETA), an American Accounting Association journal, reached its ten-year milestone in 2013. This study provides a comprehensive bibliometric and comparative analysis of the 66 main research articles and citations of the contributions, which were published from 2004 to 2013. The analysis of the characteristics of the articles comprises the research methodologies and accounting areas as used in the Brigham Young University Accounting Research Rankings, novel classifications based on an expansion of the Brown and Vasarhelyi (1994) accounting research taxonomy, and the AACSB A7 data terms, artificial intelligence, contributing authors, and institutions. The citation analysis reports and compares scholarly and patent results. Some major differences between the citations in Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus came to light.

Thirteen years of Operations Management Research (OMR) journal: a bibliometric analysis and future research directions

“…Specifically, in the domain of journals' performance analysis, the bibliometric analysis has been commonly used in several studies to analyze different journals in various discipline; for instance Finance (Baker et al 2021;Linnenluecke et al 2020;Paule-Vianez et al 2020); Accounting (Martínez-Blasco et al 2016;Muehlmann et al 2015;Yamaguchi et al 2015); Management (Mishra et al 2018), and Economic (Goyal et al 2021).…”

Bibliometric Analysis of Digital Accounting Research

“…Furthermore, this study also analyzed authors and institutions which have high contributions to IJDAR. Following Muehlmann et al (2015), the author contribution was weighted equally as 1.00 for each paper. When more than one authors contribute to one article, each author is weighted proportionally with the total value of 1.00 each paper.…”

“…Following Coyne et al (2010), this study classified methodology into 4 categories such as analytical, archival, experimental, and other. For other methodology, based on analysis results and following classification from Muehlmann et al (2015), it classified again into 7 categories such as bibliometric, case study, descriptive, design science, review, survey, and mixed study.…”

“…Lastly, Muehlmann et al (2015) conducted comprehensive analysis of the journal of emerging technologies in accounting for decade. They analyzed, first, the characteristics of the articles comprises the research methodologies and accounting areas as used in the Brigham Young University Accounting Research Rankings, novel classifications based on an expansion of the Brown and Vasarhelyi (1994) accounting research taxonomy, and the AACSB A7 data terms, artificial intelligence, contributing authors, and institutions.…”

Visibilidad de la investigación contable colombiana en Google Académico

“…Esta es una información útil para los equipos editoriales de las revistas colombianas, en el sentido que puede ser un grupo pequeño de autores los que contribuyen al incremento en el impacto de la revista. Cuatro años después se publicó un artículo más amplio donde se evaluaron los primeros 10 años de JETA; allí se encontró que el numero de citas en Google Académico es mucho mayor al registrado en Scopus y que la diferencia aumenta con respecto a WoS (Muehlmann, Chiu, & Liu, 2015). En esa segunda evaluación se concluye que Google Académico es la principal fuente para medir el impacto de una revista, por su mayor nivel de citación, y que WoS y Scopus son complementarios.…”