2023
DOI: 10.1097/ypg.0000000000000338
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Emerging trends in gene and bipolar disorder research: a bibliometric analysis and network visualisation

Abstract: This study aims to use a bibliometric technique to evaluate the scientific output of gene and bipolar disorder research. The search query related to gene and bipolar disorder from the Scopus database identified 1848 documents from 1951 to 2020. The growth in the publications increased since early 1990, peaked in 2011, and started to decline thereafter. High occurrence in author keywords suggests that some research topics, such as "polymorphism", "linkage" and "association study" have waned over time, whereas o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 55 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nonetheless, our reason behind the selection of the Scopus database was due to the notion that it has been proven to comprise a larger and more diverse coverage of the scientific literature, and from a wider range of disciplines, including international and non‐English language publications, and more comprehensive citation data (Anker et al., 2019; Pranckutė, 2021). Indeed, for the same reason most bibliometric reports and analysis in medicine and dentistry are also based on the Scopus database (Alam et al., 2023; Li et al., 2023; Nichols et al., 2023; Zakaria et al., 2023). In addition, we did our best to reduce potential biases which have traditionally been associated with the nature of bibliometric studies (Patel et al., 2013), by blinding examiners and encoding the names, affiliations, journals, and countries of the bibliographic data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonetheless, our reason behind the selection of the Scopus database was due to the notion that it has been proven to comprise a larger and more diverse coverage of the scientific literature, and from a wider range of disciplines, including international and non‐English language publications, and more comprehensive citation data (Anker et al., 2019; Pranckutė, 2021). Indeed, for the same reason most bibliometric reports and analysis in medicine and dentistry are also based on the Scopus database (Alam et al., 2023; Li et al., 2023; Nichols et al., 2023; Zakaria et al., 2023). In addition, we did our best to reduce potential biases which have traditionally been associated with the nature of bibliometric studies (Patel et al., 2013), by blinding examiners and encoding the names, affiliations, journals, and countries of the bibliographic data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%