The definition and phylogenetic placement of the autogenous molestus form of Culex pipiens has puzzled entomologists for decades. We identified genetic differences between Cx. p. pipiens (L.) and Cx. pipiens f. molestus Forskål in the SH60 fragment described previously. Single-strand conformation polymorphism analysis, cloning, and sequencing of this fragment demonstrated high polymorphism within and among individual Cx. p. pipiens, with common SH60 variants shared among individuals from distant locations. In contrast, Cx. pipiens f. molestus from New York City each contained a single SH60 variant, which was not identified in any other Cx. p. pipiens specimens analyzed. Supporting microsatellite analysis demonstrated significant but reduced gene flow between Cx. p. pipiens and Cx. pipiens f. molestus in New York relative to Cx. p. pipiens populations in New York and California. Results are discussed in the context of two contrasting hypotheses regarding the origin of Cx. pipiens f. molestus populations.
KeywordsCulex pipiens pipiens; Culex pipiens f. molestus; genetics; microsatellites; West Nile virus Culex pipiens f. molestus Forskål is a morphologically identical ecological biotype of Culex pipiens pipiens (L.) defined by a host of behavioral and physiological characteristics. In contrast to Cx. p. pipiens, Culex pipiens f. molestus has the ability to produce eggs without a vertebrate bloodmeal (autogeny); can mate in confined spaces (stenogamy); foregoes winter diapause; occupies subterranean environments with limited surface access; and feeds readily on mammals, including humans (Mattingly 1952, Vinogradova 2000. The potential public health importance of the mammal-feeding molestus biotype of Cx. p. pipiens as a human disease vector has led to a search for markers to readily identify these two forms.Despite the numerous biological differences that distinguish Cx. pipiens f. molestus from Cx. p. pipiens, reliable identification of Cx. pipiens f. molestus by using morphology and/or molecular tools and phylogenetic placement of this form within the Cx. pipiens complex
NIH Public Access
Polymerase Chain ReactionThe relative quality of all DNA extractions was evaluated by PCR amplification of a fragment of the mitochondrial NADH dehy-drogenase subunit four (ND4) by using arthropod-specific primers (Simon et al. 1994, Kent andNorris 2005). Molecular identification for all samples was obtained using the Crabtree et al. bromide-stained 2% agarose gels. All gels were run with GeneRuler 100-bp molecular mass marker (MBI Fermentas, Hanover, MD). p. pipiens were purified with the QIAquick PCR Purification or Gel Extraction kits (QIAGEN, Valencia, CA) and cloned using chemically competent TOP10 One Shot Escherichia coli (TOPO TA Cloning kit with pCR 2.1-TOPO vector catalog K4500-01, Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) to evaluate differences between SH60 variants. Transformed E. coli were grown at 37°C overnight on LB agar plates containing 50 µg/ml carbenicillin, and transformed colonies were identified by blue-white...