“…We must, however, put strong limitations on the magnitude of predicted changes in soil Hg densities because using direct (i.e., linear) relationships between soil Hg and C changes that result from our model implementation are highly unlikely in reality. For example, linear responses between Hg and C changes might be expected upon complete loss of both Hg and organic C pools (e.g., that may occur in surface organic horizons during wildfires) where significant Hg losses have in fact been observed (Artaxo et al, 2000;Brunke et al, 2001;Friedli et al, 2001;Sigler et al, 2003;Turetsky et al, 2006;. In contrast, however, the few experimental studies that correspondingly measured the fate of Hg upon C mineralisation indicate that only a small fraction of Hg may be subject to volatilisation losses upon evasion of CO 2 (Fritsche et al, 2008;Obrist et al, 2010b), which would indicate a much smaller magnitude of soil Hg losses compared to that of C. The biogeochemistry of terrestrial Hg is very complex, including various deposition and emission pathways (Graydon , 2008b;Gustin et al, 2008), redox transformations between volatile and non-volatile Hg forms (Lalonde et al, 2001;Obrist et al, 2010a), and methylation and demethylation processes (Ullrich et al, 2001).…”