2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.proci.2006.07.170
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Emission control of sodium compounds and their formation mechanisms during coal combustion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This leaded to the release of atomic sodium from ash at high temperatures. However, sodium was hardly to be released into the flue gas in the form of Na2O or NaOH, because even if NaOH was produced by Na 2 O and H 2 O at high temperatures, it would also equilibrate to produce atomic Na [22]. The results of chemical equilibrium calculation for sodium compounds by Takuwa and Naruse [23] also indicated that there was no gaseous NaOH at the temperature below 1100 o C. However, another work on particulate matter emission from brown coal combustion found NaCl mainly contributed to the emission of particles with aerodynamic diameter less than 0.1μm [24].…”
Section: Figure 6 Residual Ash Morphologies At (A)-600 O C (B)-815mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This leaded to the release of atomic sodium from ash at high temperatures. However, sodium was hardly to be released into the flue gas in the form of Na2O or NaOH, because even if NaOH was produced by Na 2 O and H 2 O at high temperatures, it would also equilibrate to produce atomic Na [22]. The results of chemical equilibrium calculation for sodium compounds by Takuwa and Naruse [23] also indicated that there was no gaseous NaOH at the temperature below 1100 o C. However, another work on particulate matter emission from brown coal combustion found NaCl mainly contributed to the emission of particles with aerodynamic diameter less than 0.1μm [24].…”
Section: Figure 6 Residual Ash Morphologies At (A)-600 O C (B)-815mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to [23], the initial species of Na in the volatile is set to be NaOH, while those of Cl 127 and S are set to be HCl and SO2, respectively. The percentage of sodium that is releasable during the 128 coal pyrolysis stage is set to 19.1%, according to the experimental data [17].…”
Section: One-dimensional Premixed/diffusion Flames Of Coal Volatile 118mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Glarborg and Marshall [20] proposed a detailed chemical reaction 77 mechanism for homogeneous alkali reactions, which was validated against experimental results on 78 sulfation of gaseous alkali chlorides. Takuwa and Naruse [23] investigated the transformation 79 characteristics of gaseous sodium compounds in a hydrogen-air combustion system via 80 zero-dimensional (0D) isothermal simulations. However, the homogeneous reaction dynamics of 81 alkali species in a pulverized-coal flame has not been reported yet.…”
Section: Introduction 35mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various control methods such as coal pretreatment (Vuthaluru et al, 1996;Vuthaluru et al, 1999) and using solid sorbents have been studied. Among these methods, the use of various kinds of solid sorbents was proved to be a simple and efficient way in combating ash-related problems and thus has been widely investigated (Punjak and Shadman, 1988;Punjak et al, 1989;Uberoi et al, 1990;Kyi and Chadwick, 1999;Tran et al, 2005;Zheng et al, 2008;Escobar et al, 2008;Schürmann et al, 2001;Vuthaluru et al, 1998;Takuwa and Naruse, 2007;Xu et al, 2014). Plenty of mineral additives such as bentonite, diatomite, bauxite and kaolinite have been tested for their capabilities and efficiencies in adsorbing alkali species.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, chemisorption prevailed for sorbents with high silica content, while physisorption for those with high alumina content. The other method for flue gas cleaning was the in-situ alkali capture by premixing additives and fuel thoroughly prior to combustion in a drop-tube furnace or a downflow combustor, where the fuel-additive mixtures were transported with the flue gas and the burning conditions were more similar to those in a power station boiler (Mwabe and Wendt, 1996;Schürmann et al, 2001;Vuthaluru et al, 1998;Takuwa and Naruse, 2007;Xu et al, 2014). Therefore, the in-situ alkali capture was a rather practical sorbent application way.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%