2011
DOI: 10.5194/acp-11-4039-2011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Emission factors for open and domestic biomass burning for use in atmospheric models

Abstract: Biomass burning (BB) is the second largest source of trace gases and the largest source of primary fine carbonaceous particles in the global troposphere. Many recent BB studies have provided new emission factor (EF) measurements. This is especially true for non-methane organic compounds (NMOC), which influence secondary organic aerosol (SOA) and ozone formation. New EF should improve regional to global BB emissions estimates and therefore, the input for atmospheric models. In this work we present an up-to-date… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

213
2,270
45
7

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,772 publications
(2,535 citation statements)
references
References 189 publications
213
2,270
45
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Also it is worth noting that, between GFED3 and GFED4, the fuel consumption was lowered to better match observations and that emission factor changes are substantial for some species and some biomes. Indeed global methane emissions are 25 % lower in GFED4 than in GFED3 mainly because of the new emission factors updated with Akagi et al (2011).…”
Section: Biomass Burningmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Also it is worth noting that, between GFED3 and GFED4, the fuel consumption was lowered to better match observations and that emission factor changes are substantial for some species and some biomes. Indeed global methane emissions are 25 % lower in GFED4 than in GFED3 mainly because of the new emission factors updated with Akagi et al (2011).…”
Section: Biomass Burningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FINNv1 uses MODIS satellite observations for active fires, land cover and vegetation density. The emission factors are from Akagi et al (2011), the estimated fuel loading are assigned using model results from Hoelzemann et al (2004), and the fraction of biomass burned is assigned as a function of tree cover (Wiedinmyer et al, 2006). The Global Fire Assimilation System (GFAS, Kaiser et al, 2012) calculates biomass burning emissions by assimilating Fire Radiative Power (FRP) observations from MODIS at a daily frequency and 0.5 • resolution and is available for the time period 2000-2013.…”
Section: Biomass Burningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An important part of forest fires occurs in the form of smoldering combustion due to higher fuel moisture (Guyon et al, 2005 other hand, flaming fires, which produce abundant BC aerosol particles, tend to exhibit lower ω 0 and higher ER BC (Akagi et al, 2011). The smoke that arrives at the ATTO site during the dry season is a mixture of smoldering and flaming emissions with varying relative fractions.…”
Section: Bc To Co Enhancement Ratiomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main source of NH 3 emissions is biomass burning including biofuel combustion, agriculture, animal husbandry, NH 3 -based fertilizer, industrial processes and vehicular emission (Paulot et al, 2017;Whitburn et al, 2015;Behera et al, 2013;Akagi et al, 2011). In urban areas, domestic fires, traffic and industrial activity are generally considered as major sources of NH 3 (Sun et al, 2017;Teng et al, 2017;Perrino et al, 2002;Sapek, 2013;Sutton et al, 2000;Whitehead et al, 2007).…”
Section: Ammonia (Nh 3 )mentioning
confidence: 99%