2021
DOI: 10.1007/s11869-021-00982-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Emission inventory for harbour-related activities: comparison of two distinct bottom-up methodologies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…PM 10 , PM 2.5 , and SO x decreased by > 96%, while NO x decreased by only 17.0%. The results are in good agreement with Sorte et al 18 and Browning et al 38 , that reported SO x could be reduced by up to 96% and 99% after switching to 0.1%-sulfur fuel ULSFO.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…PM 10 , PM 2.5 , and SO x decreased by > 96%, while NO x decreased by only 17.0%. The results are in good agreement with Sorte et al 18 and Browning et al 38 , that reported SO x could be reduced by up to 96% and 99% after switching to 0.1%-sulfur fuel ULSFO.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…NO x emissions have also slightly reduced with the switching to lower-sulfur fuels. For example, Sorte, et al 18 estimated that SO x and PM with particle size < 10 µm diameter (PM 10 ) emissions from cargo ships could be reduced by 96% and 85% if 0.1%-sulfur instead of 2.7%-sulfur fuel is used, respectively. Wan et al 19 also estimated that SO x and PM 10 emissions from 28 vessels berthing at the Shanghai Port could be reduced by 81.2% and 71.1% if they switched to 0.1%-sulfur instead of 0.5%-sulfur fuel, respectively, while NO x reduced only by 4.7%.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Modeling has the advantage, compared to measurements, that it is possible to investigate spatial variability, long-term trends, and future scenarios. However, detailed and reliable emission estimates are needed [45].…”
Section: Approaches For the Assessment Of Shipping Impacts On Atmospheric Pollutantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8-9). These studies often rely on estimates rather than 'real data' (Azarkamand et al, 2020, p. 13), but different estimation procedures and assumptions can lead to very different results: for example, a study at the Port of Leixões in Portugal comparing the two methodologies most frequently used to estimate carbon emissions at ports 4 found that one method produced an estimate of CO2 emissions that was 85% higher than the other (Sorte et al, 2021). Organisations such as the Greenport Congress and the Laboratorio de ingeniería sostenible have called for the development of common standards and an easy-to-use tool for calculating carbon footprints at seaports (Azarkamand et al, 2020, p. 13).…”
Section: Impacts At Seaportsmentioning
confidence: 99%