2023
DOI: 10.1038/s43247-023-01012-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Emission pathways and mitigation options for achieving consumption-based climate targets in Sweden

Johannes Morfeldt,
Jörgen Larsson,
David Andersson
et al.

Abstract: National emission reduction targets under the Paris Agreement have a territorial focus, incentivizing mitigation actions domestically. Here we examine the theoretical basis for adopting complementary consumption-based net-zero emission targets and assess the consequences of adopting such proposed targets for Sweden. We apply scenario analyses based on a prospective lifecycle assessment framework. The framework is a hybrid of bottom-up simulations for passenger travel, construction and housing, and food, and to… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Firstly, although digital technology can empower agricultural production, thereby significantly reducing the use of pesticides, fertilizers, agricultural films, and fuel , farmers may not necessarily understand the nature of various fertilizers, pesticides, and herbicides commonly used in conventional agriculture, and how these chemicals affect the environment, land, and water sources within a certain period based on experience. People's carbon reduction actions are greatly influenced by their perceptions (Morfeldt et al, 2023). Based on profit motives, even if farmers learn about environmentally friendly and resource-saving production information through mobile phones, broadband, television, and other channels, they will not change their resource-consuming production methods.…”
Section: Digital Empowerment and Agricultural Carbon Emissionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Firstly, although digital technology can empower agricultural production, thereby significantly reducing the use of pesticides, fertilizers, agricultural films, and fuel , farmers may not necessarily understand the nature of various fertilizers, pesticides, and herbicides commonly used in conventional agriculture, and how these chemicals affect the environment, land, and water sources within a certain period based on experience. People's carbon reduction actions are greatly influenced by their perceptions (Morfeldt et al, 2023). Based on profit motives, even if farmers learn about environmentally friendly and resource-saving production information through mobile phones, broadband, television, and other channels, they will not change their resource-consuming production methods.…”
Section: Digital Empowerment and Agricultural Carbon Emissionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To be able to obtain R, the possible growth rate of GDP from the different investment scenarios is used as depicted in Tables S5-S9. An average GDP growth rate for the specified period (between 2023 and 2050) of CB analysis was used as input for the discounting emissions cost flow rate calculated using Equation (11) in this study.…”
Section: Categorization and Monetization Of Emissionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several existing climate models, pathways, and mitigation strategies, such as the ones in Refs. [6,[10][11][12] acknowledge that reducing emissions is associated with very many environmental benefits, such as keeping the global temperatures and sea levels from rising, maintaining optimal weather events, fewer disruptions to the environment ecosystems, and decreased threat to the well-being of our planet and its inhabitants both now and later. Long-term national-level scenarios need to be evaluated so that the effects of these actions on reaching these goals may be understood.…”
Section: Introduction 1backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As in many other parts of the world, efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions within the EU and its member states have traditionally focused on levying costs of emissions on producers alongside product energy efficiency measures (Grubb et al, 2020). While a "polluter pays" approach affects consumers indirectly, as higher prices are passed on to them from producers, it rarely targets specific consumption categories and the behavioural shifts required for deep decarbonization (Morfeldt et al, 2023).…”
Section: Current Policy Framework From Eu Policy Mappingmentioning
confidence: 99%