2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2009.06.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Emission trading schemes: potential revenue effects, compliance costs and overall tax policy issues

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
21
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, carbon taxation can be administered through government tax collection institutions that are more established and effective than environmental regulatory institutions (see, e.g., Coria 2009 andPope andOwen 2009). However, there is no study that empirically compares the functional forms of transaction costs between CO 2 taxes and tradable emissions permits.…”
Section: ) Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, carbon taxation can be administered through government tax collection institutions that are more established and effective than environmental regulatory institutions (see, e.g., Coria 2009 andPope andOwen 2009). However, there is no study that empirically compares the functional forms of transaction costs between CO 2 taxes and tradable emissions permits.…”
Section: ) Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the implementation costs are considered to be lower for a carbon tax than for a tradable permits system since the former makes use of existing social institutions, like tax-collecting organs and tax systems (Pope andOwen 2009, Kerr andDuscha 2014).…”
Section: ) Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another advantage is that pricing systems such as carbon tax are less susceptible to corruption than quantity type systems, with this being demonstrated frequently at international trade interventions when quotas are compared to tariffs (Noordhaus, 2007). A further significant advantage, according to Pope and Owen (2009), is the suggestion that it would provide a more stable revenue base over time. They propose (within the Australian context) that it may generate around A$11.5 billion per annum, subject to various treasury assumptions (Pope & Owen, 2009).…”
Section: Carbon Taxmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A further significant advantage, according to Pope and Owen (2009), is the suggestion that it would provide a more stable revenue base over time. They propose (within the Australian context) that it may generate around A$11.5 billion per annum, subject to various treasury assumptions (Pope & Owen, 2009). …”
Section: Carbon Taxmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, none of these countries apply a uniform tax on all fossil fuel consumers but exempt some sectors from the tax. Tax rates vary from 10 € tCO 2 -1 to up to 150 € tCO 2 -1 (Pope and Owen, 2009). As marginal abatement costs are not known with certainty, the total amount of GHG emission abatement cannot be determined a-priori when introducing a tax.…”
Section: Policy Instrumentsmentioning
confidence: 99%