1988
DOI: 10.1021/ic00276a031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Emission wavelength independence of the excitation polarization of tris(bipyridine)ruthenium(2+)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The excitation polarization spectrum for Ru(bpy) 3 2+ is provided to allow comparison with the data for the PE-substituted complexes. Our data for Ru(bpy) 3 2+ are consistent with previous reports; the complex features a maximum r value of ≈0.15 when the excitation wavelength corresponds to the lowest MLCT transition. The fact that r < 0.4 is believed to be due to the fact that although initial excitation produces a state that is localized on a single bpy ligand, randomization from the original ligand-localized state occurs prior to light emission.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The excitation polarization spectrum for Ru(bpy) 3 2+ is provided to allow comparison with the data for the PE-substituted complexes. Our data for Ru(bpy) 3 2+ are consistent with previous reports; the complex features a maximum r value of ≈0.15 when the excitation wavelength corresponds to the lowest MLCT transition. The fact that r < 0.4 is believed to be due to the fact that although initial excitation produces a state that is localized on a single bpy ligand, randomization from the original ligand-localized state occurs prior to light emission.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The fact that r < 0.4 is believed to be due to the fact that although initial excitation produces a state that is localized on a single bpy ligand, randomization from the original ligand-localized state occurs prior to light emission. This randomization results in emission from a population in which some molecules have their emission dipoles displaced significantly from the absorption dipole 4 Absorption (fine lines, scale at left) and excitation anisotropy (bold lines, scale at right) spectra obtained at 80 K on samples in ethanol/methanol (4:1 v:v) glass: (a) Ru(bpy) 3 2+ ; (b) 44Ru ; (c) 55Ru .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The detection of rotational motions using these complexes is not an obvious result. A large number of published reports have suggested that the anisotropy and anisotropy decay of the Ru metal-ligand complexes is caused by intermolecular processes such as randomization of the excited state among the three organic ligands and/or interactions with the solvent that result in localization of the excited state after randomization (Yersin and Braun, 1991;Myrick et al, 1987;Blakley et al, 1988;Ferguson et al, 1985). The range of measurable correlation times is determined by the lifetime of the excited state.…”
Section: Olmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A large number of reports have questioned the mechanism of depolarization in the Ru-ligand complexes, which could be due in part to exchange of the excited state energy among the ligands (18). This latter process would not depend on rotational motion of the protein.…”
Section: Immunoassay For Hsamentioning
confidence: 99%