1998
DOI: 10.1039/a708466h
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Emission yield for quantitative depth profile analysis by glow discharge optical emission—the influence of discharge parameters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A comparison of sputtered crater shapes and depth profiles by Hoffmann and co-workers showed no appreciable differences between the two powering modes [39]. Finally, studies by Payling and co-workers [31] and Bengtson and Hänström [40] have shown that the quantification capabilities in the rf mode are comparable to those in the DC mode.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A comparison of sputtered crater shapes and depth profiles by Hoffmann and co-workers showed no appreciable differences between the two powering modes [39]. Finally, studies by Payling and co-workers [31] and Bengtson and Hänström [40] have shown that the quantification capabilities in the rf mode are comparable to those in the DC mode.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…They are presented simply as examples of the scope of applicability in terms of qualitative depth-resolved information. In fact, quantitative analyses on such systems would be a reasonably straightforward process [31,40]. It is believed, though a technique still in its relative infancy, that rf-GD-OES could indeed be a vital component in the arsenal of depth profiling techniques.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bengtson et al showed for DC-GD-OES that the corrected intensities are independent on the penetrated material [5,124,125]. The evaluated parameters U m and I m should also be usable to correct the intensities for different materials.…”
Section: Dependence Of Intensities On Voltage and Currentmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In the following calculations we use a fixed value of U 0 = 300 V, which is also proposed by Bengtson [5,125]. For the following evaluations we chose measurements within the range 700 V b U m b 1100 V, 15 mA b I m b 40 mA, which is sufficient to cover the current changes that will occur for measurements at constant pressure.…”
Section: Transformation Of the Sputtering Rates And Intensities To A mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is known that Y sometimes depends on the plasma operating conditions (in one study it was concluded [42,43] that although the pressure, voltage, and current have some impact on Y, the emission yield is about four times more sensitive to changes in voltage or current than it is to changes in pressure).…”
Section: Radiofrequency Glow Discharge-optical Emission Spectrometrymentioning
confidence: 95%