2003
DOI: 10.1080/09644010412331308194
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Emissions trading at Kyoto: from EU resistance to Union innovation

Abstract: (Recibido el 30-11-2014. Aprobado el 13-12-2014) Resumen. La contribución técnica presenta una discusión acerca los indicadores defi nidos por la UN-FCCC y apropiados para aplicar en proyectos de generación eléctrica en Latinoamérica. Se hace énfasis en el posible uso de indicadores para incentivar el uso de tecnologías de generación renovables y mitigar la emisión de gases con efecto invernadero a la atmósfera, en proyectos que se encuentren en fase operativa. Adicionalmente, se presenta un nuevo indicador… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
32
1
2

Year Published

2004
2004
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
32
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, however, there has been surprisingly little published within the pages of Environmental Politics. All we have is two articles on the Kyoto mechanisms (Schmitz andMichaelowa 2005, Shin 2010), one on the EU ETS (Damro and Luaces Me´ndez 2003), one on the role of carbon trading in the 2010 Australian election (Rootes 2011), and one on intergenerational justice implications of cap and trade systems (Schuppert 2011). Beyond that, there are occasional mentions in the context of more general articles on the Kyoto Protocol, European climate policy, or similar.…”
Section: Situating the Special Issuementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Interestingly, however, there has been surprisingly little published within the pages of Environmental Politics. All we have is two articles on the Kyoto mechanisms (Schmitz andMichaelowa 2005, Shin 2010), one on the EU ETS (Damro and Luaces Me´ndez 2003), one on the role of carbon trading in the 2010 Australian election (Rootes 2011), and one on intergenerational justice implications of cap and trade systems (Schuppert 2011). Beyond that, there are occasional mentions in the context of more general articles on the Kyoto Protocol, European climate policy, or similar.…”
Section: Situating the Special Issuementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, while there were some early mentions of carbon markets as instances of NEPI (e.g. Damro and Luaces Me´ndez 2003), this frame has not been used within most of the literature on such markets.…”
Section: Situating the Special Issuementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its development countered both the European Commission's intellectual convictions and the interests of industrial stakeholders (Newel and Paterson 1996;Wettestad 2005). Despite abundant scholarly work in multiple disciplines (Braun 2009;Cass 2005;Christiansen and Wettestad 2003;Damro and Mendez 2003), the making of the EU-ETS still represents a conundrum yet to be explained.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Drawing on a rich set of archival data and interviews, we reconstitute the original strategy deployed by the electricity sector to implement a carbon market in Europe. During the Kyoto Protocol, the European Commission opposed emissions trading (Cass 2005;Convery 2009;Damro and Mendez 2003;Skjaerseth and Wettestad 2008;Wettestad 2005). As for industrial companies, they pleaded against any measure involving a price on carbon Paterson 1996, 1998).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Liverman (2008) and Damro and Mendez (2003) have highlighted the fact that carbon markets were originally a US proposal that was subsequently adopted by the EU as the policy driver for climate change even when the US failed to ratify the Kyoto agreement. When we speak of carbon economies today it is important to remember that these were not envisaged solely in market-based terms in early climate change discussions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%