2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2014.01.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Emotion and politics in a mediated public sphere: Questioning democracy, responsibility and ethics in a computer mediated world

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
35
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…et al 2012) and SNS users cluster themselves in politically homogeneous networks (Borondo, J. et al 2014). Jackson, L. and Valentine, G. (2014) assume that such computer-mediated communication is a new way of doing politics through its absence and presence at the same time. Therefore, SNS are a new political and geo-political instrument of influence, and, at the same time, their use is framed by the existing territorial differences.…”
Section: Political Behaviour In Social Networking Sitesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…et al 2012) and SNS users cluster themselves in politically homogeneous networks (Borondo, J. et al 2014). Jackson, L. and Valentine, G. (2014) assume that such computer-mediated communication is a new way of doing politics through its absence and presence at the same time. Therefore, SNS are a new political and geo-political instrument of influence, and, at the same time, their use is framed by the existing territorial differences.…”
Section: Political Behaviour In Social Networking Sitesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While anonymity can strengthen the focus of participants on the argument rather than the person, and thus increase deliberative quality, at the same time it implies a lack of social control that can lead to emotional and erratic behaviour, as has been found, e.g. by analysis of Twitter discussions on new abortion legislation in the UK by Jackson and Valentine (2014). This-with regard to a rational exchange of arguments as the core of a deliberative public sphere-destructive feature of Internet communication, especially of social media, is represented by the "troll".…”
Section: Deliberative Quality Of Online Political Communicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jackson and Valentine (2014) wrote that comments sections associated with online news media can "…create an interconnected discussion that focuses not only on a political or social position but also brings emotions into political discussions and enables an engagement with the everyday, micro scale through which people live their daily lives'" (p. 201). Critiques of online settings as forums for public discourse focus on the potential for inflammatory, extreme, and/or abusive (i.e., sexist, racist) comments, particularly since the lack of social and spatial proximity to other participants can erode commenters' sense of social responsibility (Hughey & Daniels, 2013;Jackson & Valentine, 2014).…”
Section: Online Comments As Data Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%