Objective: The NIH Toolbox is intended to be responsive to the needs of investigators evaluating neurologic and behavioral function in diverse settings. Early phases of the project involved gathering information and input from potential end users.Methods: Information was collected through literature and instrument database reviews, requests for information, consensus meetings, and expert interviews and integrated into the NIH Toolbox development process in an iterative manner.Results: Criteria for instrument inclusion, subdomains to be assessed, and preferences regarding instrument cost and length were obtained. Existing measures suitable for inclusion in the NIH Toolbox and areas requiring new measure development were identified.
Conclusion:The NIH Toolbox was developed with explicit input from potential end users regarding many of its key features. Neurology The phase I goals of the NIH Toolbox 1,2 development process included: 1) the identification of criteria for the acceptance of cognitive, emotional, motor, and sensory domain specific tasks in behavioral and neurologic research, 2) the identification of existing tests and measurement tools that could potentially be included in the NIH Toolbox, and 3) the selection of subdomain areas within each comprehensive domain to be targeted by the NIH Toolbox instruments. This article presents a summary of expert input obtained from potential research end users regarding these tasks. Please note that all domain-level results from phase I are not reported in this article, but are identified in the domain-specific articles found later in this supplement.
3-14METHODS AND SAMPLE DESCRIPTIONS Overview. Obtaining phase I data was accomplished by conducting Medline literature searches and instrument database reviews, a formal online request for information (RFI) from the expert research community, an expert consensus group meeting, conducting a series of expert interviews, a second expert consensus group meeting, and then a second online RFI sent to additional clinical and domain-area experts who were identified during this process. The experts solicited during phase I activities were identified via literature searches, examination of the former Computer Retrieval of Information on Scientific Projects database (now known as the NIH Research Portfolio Online Reporting Tools), or by nomination of 1 of the 12 NIH science officers who comprised the NIH Toolbox Project Team at that time. Results from these activities were reviewed by individual domain teams, the NIH Steering Committee, external experts, and representatives from the 16 institutes that make up the NIH Blueprint for Neuroscience Research (the lead sponsor of the NIH Toolbox). Final recommendations about Toolbox inclusion criteria and content also incorporated feedback from NIH Project Team members.Requests for information. The first RFI was distributed to content-area experts to identify the criteria for subdomain content and test selection. Respondents were asked to provide ratings regarding the importance...