Emotion Dysregulation and Military Suicidality Since 2001: A Review of the Literature

Abstract

Policy makers and researchers have worked to explain the perplexing rise in U.S. military suicides since 2001, with little progress in explaining this widespread phenomenon. This article synthesizes several literatures to highlight the role of emotion dysregulation in military suicidality. After considering advances in suicidal ideation‐to‐action frameworks and the factors that contribute to the prevalence of emotion dysregulation in the modern U.S. military, it explores how military service provides for two distinct circumstances in which such emotion dysregulation may facilitate the transition from suicidal ideation to behavior. The first circumstance is high distress tolerance, wherein the effects of disproportionately high rates of adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) among service‐members may increase vulnerability to suicidal behavior. The second circumstance is preexisting acquired capability with lethal means paired with executive functioning degradation. Empirically associated with military environments, such degradation may undermine the effectiveness of top‐down emotion regulation strategies—thereby allowing acquired familiarity with lethal means to assist the transition from suicidal ideation to action. Thus, emotion dysregulation’s unique relationship with the U.S. military may help to explain the powerful correlation between service and suicide since 2001—suggesting that enhancing emotion regulation skills may present a key leverage point for effectively addressing the issue.

Thank You for Hearing My Voice – Listening to Women Combat Veterans in the United States and Israeli Militaries

“…Indeed, they were exposed to it while trying to prove themselves adequate for their roles. Research has indicated that military cultural norms may stigmatize psychological injury as “weakness” and prevent individuals from seeking help ( Stanley and Larsen, 2019 ); this outlook was indeed evident in the current research. This finding led us to think further that both scholars and interviewers who are working with veterans should be either have gone through similar processes, or – if not – should intimately learn the particularities of the military culture and military nuances to enable them to learn to be attentive listeners.…”

Leaders’ Windows of Tolerance for Affect Arousal—and Their Effects on Political Decision-making During COVID-19

“…Without adequate recovery, these stressors induce low-level, long-term arousal that deplete the system, such that their cumulative effects build allostatic load ( Stanley, 2019 ). Stressors on this pathway also include common culturally-sanctioned yet maladaptive coping strategies—compartmentalization, emotion suppression, the use of self-medicating substances, and adrenaline-seeking, addictive, violent, or self-harming behaviors (for reviews, see Stanley and Larsen, 2019 , 2021 )—that add to allostatic loads and narrow an individual’s window further.…”

Stressed Out: The Missing Influence of Stress Arousal in Emotion's Role in Political Decision‐Making

“…Furthermore, compartmentalization and emotion suppression—common ER strategies in high‐stress professions (Stanley, 2019; Stanley & Larsen, 2019, 2021)—can also build allostatic loads. Reliance on these strategies has been linked with increased sympathetic nervous system activation, sleep disturbances, cortisol reactivity, inflammation levels, and greater risk for cardiovascular disease (for reviews, see Stanley & Larsen, 2019, 2021). Culturally sanctioned, yet maladaptive, coping—such as alcohol or tobacco use and adrenaline‐seeking behaviors—can further add to allostatic loads (Stanley & Larsen, 2019, 2021).…”