1995
DOI: 10.1016/0304-422x(94)00014-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Emotion in aesthetics: Reactive and reflective models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
120
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 110 publications
(124 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
4
120
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A piece of art gains personal significance [122], and meaningfulness [6] because it triggers memory and frontal experiential systems (I-system). The moment of meaning-assignation, also called 'mastering' or 'understanding' an artwork, is therefore a pleasurable experience [123][124][125][126], engaging similar brain mechanisms as the 'aha!' moment when the solution to a problem comes to mind [127,128].…”
Section: The Arts Hypothesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A piece of art gains personal significance [122], and meaningfulness [6] because it triggers memory and frontal experiential systems (I-system). The moment of meaning-assignation, also called 'mastering' or 'understanding' an artwork, is therefore a pleasurable experience [123][124][125][126], engaging similar brain mechanisms as the 'aha!' moment when the solution to a problem comes to mind [127,128].…”
Section: The Arts Hypothesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For nearly two decades, the work of Gerald Cupchik and his associates (Cupchik, 1995;Cupchik & Gignac, 2007;Cupchik, Oatley, & Vorderer, 1998;Cupchik & Shereck, 1998) has dealt with a topic that entertainment researchers have only begun to fully appreciate and explore in recent years, namely the relationship of emotion and cognition in art and entertainment experience. It is commonplace assumption in emotion theory that emotion and cognition are inseparable (cf., Damasio, 1994;Lazarus, 1991;Scherer, 2001), however, in the field of entertainment research, relatively little is known still about the ways emotion and cognition intertwine in individuals' processing of movies, novels, games, TV shows, and other entertainment offerings.…”
Section: Making Sense Of Entertainmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This line of research on defensive biases in information processing and how they can be overcome seems to offer a promising framework for entertainment scholars as well, specifically when studying more serious forms of entertainment experiences like those described by the reflective model of aesthetic experience (Cupchik, 1995), and the concept of appreciation (Oliver & Bartsch, 2010). For example, it may be speculated that the blends of positive and negative feelings that are typically associated with the experience of appreciation ) could reflect a form of entertainment experience where painful memories and insights are framed in an affectively positive and reassuring way that makes it easier for viewers to accept this information as part of their self-image and to use it as an incentive for self-improvement and personal growth.…”
Section: Making Sense Of Entertainment 11mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Cupchik (1994) noted that emotions strongly relate to one's own bodily responses and experiences. Kuiken et al (2004) showed that readers were likely to take self-referential perspectives, especially in emotionally complex contexts.…”
Section: Story Comprehension and Emotionmentioning
confidence: 99%