2018
DOI: 10.1177/0957926518801074
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Emotion in politics: Affective-discursive practices in UKIP and Labour

Abstract: Recent political trends in many countries have sparked renewed interest in populism. Despite general agreement that the affective/emotive aspects of political communication are particularly important in this, there is little recent analysis of how populists operationalise emotion or how they genuinely differ from mainstream parties in this sense. This article applies mixed methods to explore the 'affective-discursive practices' that characterise the discourses of two opposition parties in the United Kingdom: U… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
47
0
6

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
(56 reference statements)
2
47
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Concluye De Santiago (2016 que "la selección léxica acompaña a este discurso maniqueo canónico que desprende cierto aroma a antiguo por la selección de los términos que emplea, un lenguaje propio de la retórica de la izquierda que conforma un relato próximo a la épica de la revolución de los pueblos", "una selección léxica de términos negativos extremos y una narración épica". En el volumen colectivo editado por Zienkowski y Breeze (2019), Montesano Montessori y Morales López (2019: 144) muestran, mediante los empleos discursivos de figuras retóricas como la metáfora y la sinécdoque por parte de los líderes del partido, cómo Podemos created a counterhegemonic narrative based on the demands and interpretations of 15M, in which it decodes the discourses and practices of the traditional parties and recodes and enacts those of the new politics while claiming the need to reverse the power structures in a desired opposite direction.…”
Section: Objetivo Del Trabajounclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Concluye De Santiago (2016 que "la selección léxica acompaña a este discurso maniqueo canónico que desprende cierto aroma a antiguo por la selección de los términos que emplea, un lenguaje propio de la retórica de la izquierda que conforma un relato próximo a la épica de la revolución de los pueblos", "una selección léxica de términos negativos extremos y una narración épica". En el volumen colectivo editado por Zienkowski y Breeze (2019), Montesano Montessori y Morales López (2019: 144) muestran, mediante los empleos discursivos de figuras retóricas como la metáfora y la sinécdoque por parte de los líderes del partido, cómo Podemos created a counterhegemonic narrative based on the demands and interpretations of 15M, in which it decodes the discourses and practices of the traditional parties and recodes and enacts those of the new politics while claiming the need to reverse the power structures in a desired opposite direction.…”
Section: Objetivo Del Trabajounclassified
“…Dentro de tales partidos se observan diversos acentos o rasgos particulares. Uno de los que se ha destacado en varios partidos populistas es el abundante empleo de léxico emocional (Breeze 2019). En el Documento político aquí examinado, si bien se registran algunas unidades léxicas de carácter emotivo ("ensañamiento [de las políticas de los presidentes Zapatero y Rajoy] con amplísimos sectores populares", con la consiguiente "terrible frustración de expectativas"; "imponer la resignación disfrazándola de recuperación", "violencias machistas", "el bloque del miedo"; "la agresividad de los que hoy gobiernan"; cultura misógina y violenta"), no resultan significativas ni por su abundancia ni por su frecuencia.…”
Section: Conclusión: ¿Es Populista La Construcción Discursiva De Podeunclassified
“…The aim of the paper is to semiotically unpack this myth as a case of affectivediscursive practice and thereby increase the understanding of the affective dimensions of fascist ideology and how national socialism has been discursively reinvented today. By exploring the myth as a resource of emotional appeal, the study continues the scholarly discussion on both the re-emergence of fascism and the performative power of affect in political discourse (Ahmed, 2004;Breeze, 2019;Chilton, 2017;Kølvraa, 2015;Mouffe, 2018;Salmela and von Scheve, 2018;von Scheve and Walter-Jochum, 2020;Wodak, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In broad strokes, ‘high’ politicians tend to use a rationalist or ethically‐oriented discourse, keep their emotions well under control, and may be perceived as educated and polite, or as boring and distant, while ‘low’ politicians depend more on their personal charisma, are more demonstrative or emotional, ostentatiously exhibit popular tastes, and are more likely to use coarse or popular language. Moreover, as Rensmann (2006) and Breeze (2019) have pointed out, the populist style often deliberately breaches taboos or indulges in use of language that appears to condone or even glorify violence, in ways that are calculated to engage specific sectors of the population.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, numerous analyses have centred on Donald Trump: Bhatia and Ross (2019) have studied his repeated use of particular phrases to delegitimise his rivals, McCallum‐Bayliss (2019) and Schoor (2020) have both scrutinised his use of conceptual metaphor, while Breeze (2017) has pointed to his effective, habitual use of dichotomies. Outside the US context, Breeze (2019) has analysed appeals to emotion, focusing on the contrast between anger (in populist discourse) and concern (which is more typical of mainstream politics) (Breeze, 2019). Aiezza (2019) has addressed Salvini's performances, discussing his identity‐based appeals to the in‐group.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%