2017
DOI: 10.1504/ijcvr.2017.084987
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Emotion recognition using MLP and GMM for Oriya language

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The aim is to classify and compare the accuracy and Mean Square Error performance using two of the mostly used adaptive learning functions such as Gradient Descent (GD) and Gradient Descent with Momentum (GDM). The MLP is uses the back-propagation algorithm while updating weights and biases [11][12]. It contains input, hidden and the output layers as three major units as exposed in Fig.4.…”
Section: Short Time Fourier Transform (Stft)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The aim is to classify and compare the accuracy and Mean Square Error performance using two of the mostly used adaptive learning functions such as Gradient Descent (GD) and Gradient Descent with Momentum (GDM). The MLP is uses the back-propagation algorithm while updating weights and biases [11][12]. It contains input, hidden and the output layers as three major units as exposed in Fig.4.…”
Section: Short Time Fourier Transform (Stft)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some emotions are overlapped and confusing. Few basic emotions as anger, happiness, sadness, boredom, surprise and fear has been found in literatures more often [1][2][3][4][5]. However, emotions as joy, disgust, anxiety and similar nature, emotions out shadow these basic emotions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Statistics as mean, median, standard deviation, maximum, minimum, range, etc., of these features have been attempted in this field. Features as the fundamental frequency, formants, amplitude, energy, speech rate, Linear Prediction Coefficient (LPC), Mel-Frequency Cepstral Coefficient (MFCC), Perceptual Linear Prediction (PLP) and other spectral variants have been found in literature [1][2][3][4][5][6]. Selection of suitable feature is one of the basic design criteria for emotion detection system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Researchers are investigating different heterogeneous sources of features to improve the performance of speech emotion recognition systems. In [24], performances of Mel-frequency cepstral coefficient (MFCC), linear predictive cepstral coefficient (LPCC) and perceptual linear prediction (PLP) features were examined for recognizing speech emotion that achieved a maximum accuracy of 91.75% on an acted corpus with PLP features. This accuracy is relatively low when compared to the recognition accuracy of 95.20% obtained for a fusion of audio features based on a combination of MFCC and pitch for recognizing speech emotion [25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%