Emotion regulation and behavior in an individual decision trading experiment: Insights from psychophysiology.

Abstract

A large number of private investors deviate from maximizing expected monetary value of a given decision. Instead of focusing on fundamental indicators, they have the tendency to be driven by experienced gains and losses, or the emotional arousal experienced as a result of these trends. Up till now, little is known about how emotion regulation (ER) strategies, such as reappraisal or suppression, dictate the extent to which emotions are experienced, and how they impact deviations from expected value (EV)-maximizing behavior. We seek to answer these questions in this article. To this end, we conducted an experiment with 4 treatments, where participants traded stocks with higher/lower valuation and lower/higher probabilities of price increase. Skin conductance responses, heart rate measures and questionnaires were used to measure the emotional arousal and ER strategies. The results show that using ER indeed influences the level of emotional arousal experienced. First, reappraisers experienced lower levels of arousal, and suppressors higher. Second, while reappraisal reinforced the impact of emotional arousal on EV-maximizing behavior, adopting suppression strategy had no similar impact. Third, reappraisal reinforced the impact of integral arousal on EV-maximizing decisions, especially after experiencing losses. This was not observed for suppressors, whether they experienced a gain or a loss. We infer that reappraisal has an observable impact on decisions, especially after losses, and could be used to train investors to improve decision-making performance. The article concludes with theoretical implications of emotion regulation on physiological arousal, and on maximizing the expected value in a stock trading context.

Financial Planning for Retirement: A Psychosocial Perspective

“…Related to willingness, various affective aspects and personality traits expand future research, based on complex relationships between emotions and decision-making (Hariharan et al, 2015 ). On the one hand, we should not forget that retirement marks the end of obligatory work and serves as a reminder of aging, failing health and, eventually, death.…”

Do Emotions Benefit Investment Decisions? Anticipatory Emotion and Investment Decisions in Non-professional Investors

“…Emotion regulation strategies designed to minimise variability in emotion have been found to increase the optimality of trading decisions ( Fenton-O’Creevy et al, 2011 ; Hariharan et al, 2015 ). Our study adds novel ground to this research by suggesting that emotion regulation strategies should be yoked to the current share trend, e.g.…”

Procrastination and financial planning for retirement: A moderated mediation analysis.

“…In the fifth place, the total explained variance in saving behavior does not exceed 30%, and in this light, it seems reasonable to suppose that a significant number of variables escaped our analysis. To begin with, the study does not address the attitudinal and emotional aspects involved in the decision-making process, although preliminary evidence suggests that the emotions may influence economic decisions (Hariharan, Adam, Astor, & Weinhardt, 2015; Ifcher & Zarghamee, 2014), especially in the kind of contexts, like retirement, that cause anxiety (Gutiérrez & Hershey, 2013). However, it is not only negative emotions that need to be taken into account.…”