2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.tate.2018.05.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Emotion regulation in teachers: The “why” and “how”

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
115
0
5

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 145 publications
(171 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
10
115
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Still, the results of our study cannot be directly compared to the results of the study by Blanco-Donoso et al For instance, aspects of emotion regulation (i.e., difficulties as compared to strategies) or work-ruminative tendencies (psychological detachment and relaxation as compared to detachment from work and affective work rumination) were defined and assessed differently. However, in this regard, it is worth to note that the present study attended to emotion regulation strategies based on the process model of emotion regulation (Gross, 2001, 2015), which is in correspondence with much previous research on emotion regulation in relation to (human service) work (Jiang et al, 2016; Taxer and Gross, 2018; Yin et al, 2018). Furthermore, contrasting the present study to that of Blanco-Donoso et al (2017), it can be argued that the present results may be more plausible with regard to the possibility of making general inference and expectations to other type of professions.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Still, the results of our study cannot be directly compared to the results of the study by Blanco-Donoso et al For instance, aspects of emotion regulation (i.e., difficulties as compared to strategies) or work-ruminative tendencies (psychological detachment and relaxation as compared to detachment from work and affective work rumination) were defined and assessed differently. However, in this regard, it is worth to note that the present study attended to emotion regulation strategies based on the process model of emotion regulation (Gross, 2001, 2015), which is in correspondence with much previous research on emotion regulation in relation to (human service) work (Jiang et al, 2016; Taxer and Gross, 2018; Yin et al, 2018). Furthermore, contrasting the present study to that of Blanco-Donoso et al (2017), it can be argued that the present results may be more plausible with regard to the possibility of making general inference and expectations to other type of professions.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…The importance of the emotion regulation strategies reappraisal and suppression has also been reported in relation to teachers’ occupational health and well-being. Taxer and Gross (2018) reported that teachers were most inclined to down regulate negative emotions through the use of suppression. Furthermore, Jiang et al (2016) found that teachers’ self-reflections of emotion regulation strategies (interviews) corresponded with students’ perceptions (questionnaire); teachers’ use of suppression was related to less desirable student evaluations (e.g., annoyed, distracted), and teachers’ use of reappraisal was related to more desirable (e.g., inspired, tender) student evaluations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gross (1998) suggested that people use various emotion regulation strategies. Among the most frequently applied emotion regulation strategiesin the general population, but also for regulating teachers' emotions in the classroom-are problem solving, cognitive reappraisal, activity and social support, avoidance, suppression, and rumination (Sutton, 2004;Burić et al, 2017;Izadpanah et al, 2017;Taxer and Gross, 2018). These strategies are considered differentially effective for maintaining affective well-being (Sheppes and Gross, 2012).…”
Section: Teachers' Emotion Regulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cette tendance est particulièrement vraie pour les émotions négatives. Les enseignants cherchent à réguler ces émotions afin de maintenir leur objectif initial -celui de former les étudiants (Sutton, 2004 ;Taxer & Gross, 2018). La littérature mentionne, par ailleurs, une plus grande tendance des enseignants à réguler les émotions négatives à la baisse (Jiang et al, 2016) plutôt que de réguler les émotions positives à la hausse.…”
Section:  éMotions Des Enseignants Comme Variable Dépendante : Facteunclassified