Cognitive Readiness in Project Teams 2019
DOI: 10.4324/9780429490057-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Emotional and Social Intelligence Competencies for Project Management

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
69
0
26

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(98 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
3
69
0
26
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, some test developers moved away from pure ability based questions and utilized self-report questions (i.e., questions asking participants to rate behavioral tendencies and/or abilities rather than objectively assessing their abilities; e.g., Schutte et al, 1998). Other measures utilized broader definitions of EI that included social effectiveness in addition to typical EI facets (see Ashkanasy and Daus, 2005) (e.g., Boyatzis et al, 2000; Boyatzis and Goleman, 2007). Over time it became clear that these different measures were tapping into related, yet distinct underlying constructs.…”
Section: Early Research On Emotional Intelligencementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In particular, some test developers moved away from pure ability based questions and utilized self-report questions (i.e., questions asking participants to rate behavioral tendencies and/or abilities rather than objectively assessing their abilities; e.g., Schutte et al, 1998). Other measures utilized broader definitions of EI that included social effectiveness in addition to typical EI facets (see Ashkanasy and Daus, 2005) (e.g., Boyatzis et al, 2000; Boyatzis and Goleman, 2007). Over time it became clear that these different measures were tapping into related, yet distinct underlying constructs.…”
Section: Early Research On Emotional Intelligencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mixed measures are particularly appropriate in the context of the workplace. This seems to be the case for two reasons: first, the tendency to frame EI as a set of competencies that can be trained (e.g., Goleman, 1995; Boyatzis and Goleman, 2007) is likely to equip workers with a positive growth mindset regarding their EI. Second, the emphasis on 360 degree forms of assessment in mixed measures provides individuals with information not only on their self-perceptions, but on how others perceive them which is also particularly useful in training situations.…”
Section: Recommendations Regarding the Appropriate Use Of Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Many researchers classify soft skills as non-cognitive skills. Here we underline EI (Emotional Intelligence) by D. Goleman [36], critical thinking or problem solving. Soft skills include both social, interpersonal skills and meta-competences, i.e.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The assessment tool is the Emotional and Social Competency Inventory—University Edition (ESCI-U), which consists of 70 items 2 (five per competency) measuring the frequency of behaviors associated with the competencies (Boyatzis and Goleman, 2007). Each item starts with How often do you/does the target… and is followed by a behavioral description such as …understand another person’s feelings?…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%