2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2012.01.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Emotional context influences access of visual stimuli to anxious individuals’ awareness

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Socially anxious people are more likely to interpret nonthreatening faces as threatening (Heuer, Lange, Isaac, Rinck, & Becker, 2010). Furthermore, high trait anxiety individuals require shorter stimulus exposure times to become aware of threatening face targets in their stimuli (Ruderman & Lamy, 2012). It is possible, then, that anxious participants were uniquely skilled at detecting face targets.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Socially anxious people are more likely to interpret nonthreatening faces as threatening (Heuer, Lange, Isaac, Rinck, & Becker, 2010). Furthermore, high trait anxiety individuals require shorter stimulus exposure times to become aware of threatening face targets in their stimuli (Ruderman & Lamy, 2012). It is possible, then, that anxious participants were uniquely skilled at detecting face targets.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The goal of Experiment 2 was to replicate Experiment 1 using nonsocial target stimuli to assess the extent to which the effects in Experiment 1 may be better characterized in a social cognition context. Given past research indicating differential face perception performance in anxious participants (Heuer et al, 2010; Ruderman & Lamy, 2012), it is possible that participants in an uncertain emotional state are uniquely skilled at face perception. If this is the case, the results of Experiment 1 would not be expected to extend to the house stimuli used in Experiment 2.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, in adults with high trait anxiety, the anxious state lowers awareness thresholds. In particular, fearful faces or non-threat faces presented among threatening faces are detected faster (Ruderman and Lamy, 2012). Neurocognitive functioning in stress thus drops cognitive flexibility (i.e., reduced functions of the dorsolateral PFC) to stay focused on the stressors, this attentional tunneling during emotional arousal allows the individual to detach from the ''peripheral'' information unrelated to the stressor that might distract the individual who is under pressure (e.g., Palamarchuk and Vaillancourt, under review; see also Brosch et al, 2013;LeBlanc et al, 2015).…”
Section: Decision Making and Stressmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most recent studies in this field focus on social and contextual stimulus cues, which can both be processed unconsciously (Gobbini and others 2013; Ruderman and Lamy 2012) and activate the amygdala (Frith and Frith 2012). It appears now that even stimulus category (eg, animal or object) can influence the degree of amygdala activation for relatively matched affective unconscious stimuli (Fang and others 2016).…”
Section: Affective Pathways Revealed By Studies Of Blindsight and Uncmentioning
confidence: 99%