Emotional Dimensions in Integrated Care for People with Multiple Complex Problems

Abstract

Cross-boundary collaboration, both multiprofessional and interorganizational, is needed when providing integrated care for people with multiple problems, who need services at the same time from diverse care providers. Multiple problems of clients also pose extra challenges for interaction between care professionals and clients. Emotional dynamics are always present in everyday interaction between human beings, but seldom explicitly addressed in research on integrated care. The aim of this reflective paper is to illustrate the emotional dimensions of integrated care in light of the experiences of care professionals in the context of care for people with multiple complex problems. The paper draws on a Finnish study on integrated care reflecting its findings from the perspective of emotional labor. The difficult life situations of people with multiple complex problems form an emotional burden, which is mirrored in the interaction between clients and professionals and affects relational dynamics among professionals. Professionals’ fear of emotions and the different ‘feeling rules’ of care professions and sectors pose extra challenges to professionals’ collaboration in this emotionally loaded context. Alongside the structural and functional aspects of integrated care, it is important that emotions embedded in everyday cross-boundary collaboration are recognized and taken into account in order to ensure the success of integrated care.

Research on How Emotional Expressions of Emotional Labor Workers and Perception of Customer Feedbacks Affect Turnover Intentions: Emphasis on Moderating Effects of Emotional Intelligence

“…There exist various emotional labor related problems including Employee Well-being and Organizational Well-being (Diefendorff et al, 2011; Grandey and Gabriel, 2015), Self-actualization through the interaction, Job Commitment, Professional Efficacy, Turnover Intentions (Quinones et al, 2016), Job Stressor (Mauno et al, 2017), Job Burnout (Chan, 2006; Zhao et al, 2018), Emotional Burden in the Interaction (Hujala and Oksman, 2018), and Work-life balance and Job Satisfaction (Hofmann and Stokburger-Sauer, 2017).…”

Exploring healthcare providers’ perceptions regarding the prevention and treatment of chronic pain in breast cancer survivors: A qualitative analysis among different disciplines

“…Therefore, it is important to explicitly share beliefs [ 108 ]. This calls for interventions that promote reflection and conversation among HCPs [ 109 ]. For example, interdisciplinary roundtable meetings could stimulate a shared work culture, give opportunities to address and negotiate diverging beliefs, and achieve a consensus between different goals.…”

How do clients with multiple problems and (in)formal caretakers coproduce integrated care and support? A longitudinal study on integrated care trajectories of clients with multiple problems

“…Furthermore, our study shows that for delivering integrated care, formal caretakers experience difficulties not only because of the fragmented delivery system, as is often discussed in the literature but also because bureaucratic procedures mostly follow a linear logic. 4 , 7 , 9 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 These procedures stipulate that in predefined steps, starting with a multidimensional diagnosis, CWMPs and formal caretakers (must) work towards an outcome (e.g., social benefits or debt restructuring). While these procedures safeguard equal treatment of equal cases, they do not facilitate or initiate iterative processes.…”

“… 9 Many studies have focused on the barriers, difficulties and effects of cross‐sectoral, cross‐organizational and interprofessional collaboration. 4 , 7 With the main focus on these levels of integration, clients often seem to be implicitly conceptualized as passive recipients of care, not as active coproducers of services. 4 , 10 Consequently, clients' impact on the establishment and outcomes of integrated care may be overlooked.…”