Emotional disorders among informal caregivers in the general population: target groups for prevention

Abstract

BackgroundThere are indications that informal caregiving negatively impacts caregivers’ mental health, but this was hardly examined using diagnoses of mental disorders and most studies used convenience samples without including non-caregivers as reference group. We examine whether informal caregivers more often have any emotional disorder, i.e. mood or anxiety disorder, than non-caregivers. Identify key risk indicators for any emotional disorder among informal caregivers in the general population.MethodsData were used from the second wave of the Netherlands Mental Health Survey and Incidence Study-2 (NEMESIS-2), a nationally representative face-to-face survey (n = 5,303; aged 21–68). Respondents were defined as informal caregiver when they provided unpaid care in the 12 months preceding the second wave to a family member, partner or friend who needed care because of physical or mental problems, or ageing. Twelve-month DSM-IV diagnoses of emotional disorders were assessed using the Composite International Diagnostic Interview 3.0. Key risk indicators were identified using the following aspects: prevalence, odds ratio, attributable risk proportion, and number needed to treat. Sociodemographic, caregiving-related and other characteristics were considered as risk indicators.ResultsIn the past year, 31.1% of the respondents provided informal care, which ranged in time spent (8 or more hours/week: 32.1%) and duration (longer than 1 year: 48.7%). Informal caregiving was not associated with having any 12-month emotional disorder. Among caregivers, giving care to a first-degree relative, partner or close friend and giving emotional support increased the risk for any emotional disorder. Moreover, using all aspects, target groups were identified for prevention: caregivers without a job, living without a partner, and with a lack of social support.ConclusionsAlthough informal caregivers do not have an increased risk of emotional disorders, key risk indicators were identified using four aspects. Especially informal caregivers with limited resources (unemployment, living without a partner, lack of social support) may benefit from targeted prevention whereas general prevention measures may be desirable for carers with a burdensome care situation (giving care to a close loved one or providing emotional support).

Informal caregivers of people with an intellectual disability in England: health, quality of life and impact of caring

“…Focusing on evidence emerging from populationbased studies, caregivers, compared to non-caregivers, report poorer mental health (Hirst 2005, Smith et al 2014, Trivedi et al 2014)although not always (see Robison et al 2009, Tuithof et al 2015. The evidence on physical health is even less consistent.…”

Caring for Family Members With Alzheimer’s and Burnout Syndrome: Impairment of the Health of Housewives

“…This finding is also consistent with the results found in our study. Informal caregivers show higher risk of suffering from emotional problems such as anxiety and depression (Tuithof et al, 2015;Méndez et al, 2010), and their health is also more affected.…”

“…Although it cannot be affirmed that caregiving is the direct cause of the high scores on depressive symptomatology, its influence would probably be considerable because of its implications for potentially high stress (Fernández-Lansac and Crespo, 2011;Armon et al, 2014). In fact, depression levels in informal caregivers are associated with lack of resources and social support and perceived overburden due to the work of caregiving (Tuithof et al, 2015).…”

Illustration of informal caregiving within Saudi society: demography, scope of care and enabling arrangements

“…This study's findings detected significant associations between not working or studying with weaker enabling variables and lower healthy life indicators. Of all participants, about one‐fourth did not work or study; in addition, more than one‐fourth were not married, which requires greater focus because a recent study reported that being in either category imposes greater risks for emotional disorders among informal caregivers. Conversely, although holding a job is positively associated with caregiver emotions, it is expected to be demanding in terms of balancing dual responsibilities in communities that lack supportive formal childcare, as well as formal long‐term care.…”