2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2021.113777
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Emotional facial expression recognition and depression in adolescent girls: Associations with clinical features

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
5
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Alternatively, that depressed adolescent females were less likely to correctly identify angry faces than males is consistent with a previous study reporting that depressed females were less sensitive to angry emotional faces. 51 In contrast to these gender differences, we found no significant disparities in the accuracy of sad face recognition, possibly because sadness is a less physiologically and psychologically intense negative emotion than fear or anger. Thus, it appears that only highly stimulating negative emotional information can reveal gender differences in facial emotion recognition among adolescents with depression and NSSI.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 72%
“…Alternatively, that depressed adolescent females were less likely to correctly identify angry faces than males is consistent with a previous study reporting that depressed females were less sensitive to angry emotional faces. 51 In contrast to these gender differences, we found no significant disparities in the accuracy of sad face recognition, possibly because sadness is a less physiologically and psychologically intense negative emotion than fear or anger. Thus, it appears that only highly stimulating negative emotional information can reveal gender differences in facial emotion recognition among adolescents with depression and NSSI.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 72%
“…Of the 24 facial emotion recognition studies that referenced intensity levels of their stimuli, only eight (33.3%) reported results for different intensity levels (Auerbach et al, 2015;Bowen et al, 2014;Hauschild et al, 2020;Lee et al, 2013;Martin-Key et al, 2018;Pozzoli et al, 2017;Smith et al, 2010;Zupan, 2015); five (20.8%) additional studies reported accuracy for high intensity expressions only (Fairchild et al, 2009;Legenbauer et al, 2018;Lydon & Nixon, 2014;Sully et al, 2015;Whitaker & Widen, 2018). Of the remaining studies, eight (33.3%) reported results based on an overall intensity only (Airdrie et al, 2018;Fairchild et al, 2010;Hauschild et al, 2020;Kessels et al, 2014;McClure et al, 2005;Novello et al, 2018;Shenk et al, 2013;Thomas et al, 2007;van Rijn et al, 2011), and four (16.7%) reported results based on the minimum intensity threshold for recognition (Leganes-Fonteneau et al, 2020;Porter-Vignola et al, 2021;Short et al, 2016;Vanhalst et al, 2017). Only one of the seven studies investigating vocal emotion recognition examined intensity (Zupan, 2015); this study reported overall recognition of vocal emotion expressions, but also recognition of high and low intensity expressions.…”
Section: Emotion Expression Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…of the studies (n = 36; 76.6%) included both male and female participants. Of the remaining 11 studies, 7 (14.9%) included only females(Auerbach et al, 2015;Fairchild et al, 2010; Lule et al, 2014;Porter-Vignola et al, 2021; H happy, S sad, A angry, F fearful, D disgust, Sur surprise, N neutral…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These adverse outcomes can be mainly attributed to the cognitive impairments and neuroanatomical irregularities associated with depression. Prior research has shown that adolescents with MDD experience cognitive impairments in many domains, including memory [4], emotion recognition [5], attention, and cognitive control [6]. At the neuroanatomical level, substantial evidence from adolescent patients has implicated abnormalities of the hippocampus [7], a core region of the limbic system that is intricately linked to cognitive abilities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%