2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2021.09.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Emotional Intelligence and Burnout Related to Resident-Assessed Faculty Teaching Scores

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
15
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Improved teaching scores have been shown to mitigate aspects of burnout within surgeons. 14 Residents voiced significant benefit from working with a variety of surgeon educators, who demonstrate different techniques and broaden their perspectives and abilities. A surgeon’s fundamental personality, whether it be gentler and more reserved or loud and commanding, does not inherently make someone a “good” or “bad” teacher.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Improved teaching scores have been shown to mitigate aspects of burnout within surgeons. 14 Residents voiced significant benefit from working with a variety of surgeon educators, who demonstrate different techniques and broaden their perspectives and abilities. A surgeon’s fundamental personality, whether it be gentler and more reserved or loud and commanding, does not inherently make someone a “good” or “bad” teacher.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although faculty have reported on the importance of being sensitive to learners’ needs, 12 their ability to accurately identify those needs is reportedly limited. 13 Lewis et al 14 found a significant difference between faculty self-assessment of teaching compared with resident assessments. Faculty and residents significantly diverge in educational priorities during the same case.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SEF:ED was developed by a research Team led by the second author of this article; the Team focused on a number of projects aimed to create, validate, then use EI‐related instruments to investigate the relationship between EI and related constructs and the extent to which EI can be trained (Fast, 2021). The SEF:ED is the third EI instrument developed by the Team and was adapted in part from the first EI scale, Scale of Emotional Functioning: Medicine (SEF:MED; see Beierle, et al, 2018; Lewis et al, 2021; McCallum et al, 2022). The SEF:MED was developed from scrutiny of the EI literature and available EI instruments and three subscales were created: Emotional Awareness (EA), Emotional Management (EM), and Interpersonal Relationships (IR) respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…22 There is also a global assessment of teaching ability that is scored on a 10-point scale that can be used alone and represented as interval data. 16 Prior research focusing on the SETQ informed validity evidence supporting the use of this instrument for surgeon faculty 22 and Ob/Gyn faculty specifically, 23 as well as for both trainee (e.g., resident) assessment of faculty and faculty self-assessment. 22 Reliability and validity data for the SETQ varies, for example, internal consistency reliability (Cronbach's α) ranged from 0.86 to 0.96 for the resident evaluation tool and from 0.73 to 0.92 for the faculty selfassessment tool.…”
Section: Teaching Abilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The demonstrated associations between EI and IP 2,9 and EI and teaching ability 16 suggest that IP may impact teaching ability; however, the nature of this potential relationship has not been clearly established. Both EI and IP involve the outward display of internal processing, and it is less clear how these internal processes may impact interactions with others.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%