2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2009.03.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Emotional labor and leadership: A threat to authenticity?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

15
311
1
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 315 publications
(329 citation statements)
references
References 123 publications
(188 reference statements)
15
311
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…When the leader is psychologically distant, this translates in less emotional work and this can be a serious threat to his or her authenticity, because his followers might perceive him as not displaying real emotions, but rather to be "surface acting, which involves simulating emotions appropriate for the situation that are not actually felt" (Gardner et al, 2009). Moreover, being psychologically distant means that followers will have the tendency to make an attribution error and to base their explanations of certain events on the leader's traits and abilities rather than on the circumstances (because the leaders is too far, followers have less information regarding his or her activities and followers allocate less explanatory power to things that they do not understand) (Popper, 2013).…”
Section: Figure3 the Gulliver Effect Triggered By The Leadership Promentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the leader is psychologically distant, this translates in less emotional work and this can be a serious threat to his or her authenticity, because his followers might perceive him as not displaying real emotions, but rather to be "surface acting, which involves simulating emotions appropriate for the situation that are not actually felt" (Gardner et al, 2009). Moreover, being psychologically distant means that followers will have the tendency to make an attribution error and to base their explanations of certain events on the leader's traits and abilities rather than on the circumstances (because the leaders is too far, followers have less information regarding his or her activities and followers allocate less explanatory power to things that they do not understand) (Popper, 2013).…”
Section: Figure3 the Gulliver Effect Triggered By The Leadership Promentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Liu Chao studied the influence of supervisors' emotional labor on transformational leadership and organizational identification in the context of Chinese culture, and empirical research found that surface acting had negative correlation with organizational identity, while supervisors' deep acting and sincere acting had positive correlation with organizational identity, of which transformational leadership plays the part of the intermediary role in relationship between organizational identity and the supervisors' emotional labor [31].…”
Section: Supervisors' Emotional Labor On Subordinatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this assumption, which can be compared to the widely adopted emotional display rule "service with a smile" (Barger & Grandey, 2006, p.1229, excludes the possibility that leaders do not always feel happy, in which case displays of happiness are likely to lead to adverse effects for leaders themselves such as emotional exhaustion (Grandey, 2003). What is more, leader emotional displays that are not genuinely felt can be perceived as inauthentic by followers and can thus undermine the intended positive consequences of leader emotional labour (Gardner, Fischer, & Hunt, 2009;van Kleef et al, 2012).…”
Section: State Conceptualisations Of Leadership and Affectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this assumption, which can be compared to the widely adopted emotional display rule "service with a smile" (Barger & Grandey, 2006, p.1229, excludes the possibility that leaders do not always feel happy, in which case displays of happiness are likely to lead to adverse effects for leaders themselves such as emotional exhaustion (Grandey, 2003). What is more, leader emotional displays that are not genuinely felt can be perceived as inauthentic by followers and can thus undermine the intended positive consequences of leader emotional labour (Gardner, Fischer, & Hunt, 2009;van Kleef et al, 2012 Additionally, observers can make cognitive inferences based on the perception of emotional expressions, which is encapsulated in the notion of affectas information (Schwarz & Clore, 1983;). More specifically, emotional expressions convey social information to observers with regards to how the expresser appraises and responds to things such as the interaction partner or the situation (van Knippenberg & van Kleef, 2016).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%