2012
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00475
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Emotional Mimicry in Social Context: The Case of Disgust and Pride

Abstract: A recent review on facial mimicry concludes that emotional mimicry is less ubiquitous than has been suggested, and only occurs in interactions that are potentially affiliative (see Hess and Fischer, in revision). We hypothesize that individuals do not mimic facial expressions that can be perceived as offensive, such as disgust, and mimic positive emotion displays, but only when the context is affiliative (i.e., with intimates). Second, we expect that in spontaneous interactions not mimicry, but empathic feelin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
56
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
7
56
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, studies in which facial mimicry of perceived expressions was measured rather than blocked (e.g. Hess and Blairy, 2001;Fischer et al, 2012a) did not show associations between facial movements and accuracy of emotion recognition. The same was true for studies in which recognition tasks employed prototypical facial expressions (e.g.…”
Section: Embodied Simulation and Emotion Recognitionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…In particular, studies in which facial mimicry of perceived expressions was measured rather than blocked (e.g. Hess and Blairy, 2001;Fischer et al, 2012a) did not show associations between facial movements and accuracy of emotion recognition. The same was true for studies in which recognition tasks employed prototypical facial expressions (e.g.…”
Section: Embodied Simulation and Emotion Recognitionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Emotional mimicry is thus the imitation of an emotional intention, rather than the movement of facial muscles. Emotional mimicry will therefore occur only if the emotional signal and the relationship are perceived as affiliative [25]. In support of this social-contextual view of emotional mimicry, many clinicians in our study felt uncomfortable being instructed to mimic.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…However, with the exception of one recent report (Tuck, Grant, Sollers, et al, 2016), studies have operationalized expressive skills in terms of broad positive or negative valence and have not looked at the ability to flexibly regulate specific emotions. Discrete emotions have precise signals that serve specific functions within the social environment (e.g., Fischer, Becker, & Veenstra, 2012;Fischer & Roseman, 2007;Keltner, 1995). Consequently, some emotions may be more closely related to physical health than others (Tuck, Grant, Jackson, Brooks, & Consedine, 2016;Tuck, Grant, Sollers, et al, 2016), and valence-based assessments of positive/negative expressivity may obscure emotionspecific links.…”
Section: What Does This Study Addmentioning
confidence: 99%