2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2016.10.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Emotional nonacceptance within the context of traumatic event exposure: The explanatory role of anxiety sensitivity for traumatic stress symptoms and disability among Latinos in a primary care setting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
22
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
2
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In line with our hypothesis, we found that elevated emotion dysregulation at baseline predicted increases in PTSS at Month‐1 follow‐up through heightened AS at Week 3, after controlling for treatment condition and initial PTSS and AS. These findings are consistent with limited cross‐sectional work examining the mechanistic role of AS as it relates to emotion dysregulation and PTSS (Viana et al, 2018; Viana et al, 2017; Woodward et al, 2018), and expands this work by utilizing a diverse clinical sample of adults. Theory suggests that emotion dysregulation may entail greater difficulties discerning between bodily sensations and negative emotional states, leading individuals to view bodily sensations as unpredictable and frightening (Tull, 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In line with our hypothesis, we found that elevated emotion dysregulation at baseline predicted increases in PTSS at Month‐1 follow‐up through heightened AS at Week 3, after controlling for treatment condition and initial PTSS and AS. These findings are consistent with limited cross‐sectional work examining the mechanistic role of AS as it relates to emotion dysregulation and PTSS (Viana et al, 2018; Viana et al, 2017; Woodward et al, 2018), and expands this work by utilizing a diverse clinical sample of adults. Theory suggests that emotion dysregulation may entail greater difficulties discerning between bodily sensations and negative emotional states, leading individuals to view bodily sensations as unpredictable and frightening (Tull, 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, only one aspect of emotion dysregulation was investigated, and this finding needs to be replicated among a more diverse sample. Next, Viana et al (2017) and Woodward, Viana, Raines, Hanna, and Zvolensky (2018) showed that AS underlied the association between emotion dysregulation total and subscale scores and PTSD symptoms among 74 adolescent inpatients. However, it is unclear if these findings can be generalized to adults with less severe symptoms, and the cross‐sectional nature of the data precludes conclusions about directionality.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…During the 2016 election cycle, observed was candidate language never been seen previously in the United States (Zeff, 2017). Because of the harsh language used against perceived targeted groups, children across the United States who identified within these groups became frightened (Costello, 2016), and consequently more susceptible to trauma experienced by the rash of negative media attention given to such rhetoric (Viana et al, 2017). Counselors and educators took notice (American Counseling Association, 2016) as these new behaviors occurred in classrooms and soon were identified as trauma (Zeff, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The trauma identified in children of perceived targeted groups can hinder their cognitive-developmental learning and subsequent well-being (Gungor & Perdu, 2017;Shoshani, Steinmetz, & Kanat-Maymon, 2016;Thornburn, 2015;Viana, Paulus, Bakshaie, Garza, Valivieso, & Ochoa-Perez, 2017;Willis & Nagel, 2015;Zeanah & Sonuga-Barke, 2016). The themes identified and variables found can lead to an understanding of how counselors and educators can intervene to minimize election cycle trauma inflicted by the harsh language of the 2016 election cycle (Banyard, Hamby, & Grych, 2017;Collins, 2008;Willis & Nagel, 2015).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%