2016
DOI: 10.1080/13504622.2016.1175549
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Emotions and values – a case study of meaning-making in ESE

Abstract: a department of science and mathematics Education, umeå university, umeå, sweden; b department of applied Educational sciences, umeå university, umeå, sweden ABSTRACTWith an interest in the role of emotions and values in students' meaningmaking in Environmental and Sustainability Education a case study was carried out in a Swedish school-class with students, 12 years of age. During a six-week thematic group-work focusing environmental and sustainability issues related to food, the students were observed and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0
5

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
22
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…More so, our study showed that it was not just considered by students, but also significantly correlated with the environmental dimension. A possible explanation for this is that students respond with more positive emotions to sociocultural aspects of sustainability, as emotions and values have been shown to play a strong role in the ways that students make meaning of sustainability [74]. If this was the case, then this may provide an explanation for the predictive effect of sociocultural sustainability conceptions on both PPR CURRENT and PPR FUTURE of sustainability among students.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More so, our study showed that it was not just considered by students, but also significantly correlated with the environmental dimension. A possible explanation for this is that students respond with more positive emotions to sociocultural aspects of sustainability, as emotions and values have been shown to play a strong role in the ways that students make meaning of sustainability [74]. If this was the case, then this may provide an explanation for the predictive effect of sociocultural sustainability conceptions on both PPR CURRENT and PPR FUTURE of sustainability among students.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, the influence of the social environment has a significant impact on the average level of character internalization on students. [8] The method used in the PIKOLASA value model can be in the form of dialogue, writing, discussion, portfolio, role-playing games, simulations, contrived or real value-laden situations, in-depth self-analysis exercises, sensitivity activities, out-of-class activities, small group discussions, piloting, value analysis, interviews, jurisprudence, and value inquiry. These activities are considered very suitable to be applied to a self-awareness program related to the mission of students' values, morals, attitudes, and behavior.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…En didáctica de las ciencias esta cuestión no se ha tratado hasta hace poco. La mayoría de los estudios utilizan cuestionarios, solos (Godfrey y Feng, 2017) o combinados con grupos focales (Campbell-Arvai, 2015) o entrevistas (Manni, Sporre y Ottander, 2017), para estudiar las creencias, no la participación en prácticas científicas. Dos estudios la abordan desde una perspectiva argumentativa (Jin, Mehl y Lan, 2015;Morin et al, 2014).…”
Section: Marco Teórico: Argumentación Y Dietas Sustentablesunclassified