2019
DOI: 10.4324/9781351133319
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Emotions in Late Modernity

Abstract: Emotional complexity and complex understandings of emotions2 Emotive-cognitive rationality, background emotions and emotion work ÅSA WETTERGREN Introduction 27 Emotion and reason 27 Emotion, action and emotion work 30 Assumptions and implications of the model 32 Emotional regime vs emotive-cognitive frame 33 The Migration Board: procedural correctness 34 Conclusion 37 Notes 38 References 39 3 Conceptualising valences in emotion theories: a sociological approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 252 publications
(315 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The undermining effect of effortful closeness was especially apparent for students’ anxiety, disappointment and shame; for these emotions, the interaction effect meant that the already relatively small positive effects of teacher closeness were cancelled out completely (see Figure 3 ). Thus, closeness became irrelevant especially for negative emotions with an outcome focus rather than an activity focus (i.e., being bored or angry; Pekrun, 2017 ). Anxiety and shame are, moreover, connected to feelings of uncontrollability and avoidance of failure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The undermining effect of effortful closeness was especially apparent for students’ anxiety, disappointment and shame; for these emotions, the interaction effect meant that the already relatively small positive effects of teacher closeness were cancelled out completely (see Figure 3 ). Thus, closeness became irrelevant especially for negative emotions with an outcome focus rather than an activity focus (i.e., being bored or angry; Pekrun, 2017 ). Anxiety and shame are, moreover, connected to feelings of uncontrollability and avoidance of failure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each item was rated on a scale from 1 (disagree) to 5 (agree). Items were organized according to nine discrete academic emotions which, in line with Pekrun ( 2006 , 2017 ), reflected emotions experienced during the lesson (anger, anxiety, boredom and enjoyment) and after the lesson (‘now the lesson is over…’, pride, relaxation, relief, disappointment, and shame). Note that relief, although in essence a positive emotion, had a negative connotation in our approach (e.g., ‘I am glad the lesson is over’).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Deficit theory hypothesises that weak performance and memories of this performance result in experiences of higher anxiety in the future [ 26 ] whereas cognitive interference theory conjectures that high levels of anxiety negatively impact subsequent performance [ 26 ]. The control-value theory of anxiety-based achievement is that negative activating emotions potentially impair attention, motivation, and self-regulation, resulting in poor performance, which moulds future perceptions and emotions about performance [ 27 ]. Kessler [ 23 ] points out that anxiety disorders are some of the most commonplace mental health disorders.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This pattern continues in the literature, for example, with elevated reports of anxiety disorders being associated with intellectual disability [ 35 ], Williams Syndrome [ 36 ], physical disability [ 37 ], learning disability [ 38 ], learning disorders [ 39 ] and learning difficulties [ 21 ]. Pekrun [ 27 ] also highlights the correlation between anxiety and performance. It is clear from the literature that anxiety affects a varying portion of the population and is prevalent among students with additional needs.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The intensity of EE is modeled by Davis and Bellocchi (2019), which builds on the work of Collins (2004) and emotions research in science education. In that model, intensity is evaluated by studying microinteractional data as described in the conceptual framing.…”
Section: Measuring Emotional Energymentioning
confidence: 99%