Emotions in the VCSE sector during the pandemic

Terry, Vita; Davis, Houda; Taylor, Marilyn

doi:10.51952/9781447365532.ch013

Cited by 1 publication

(2 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…As the civil aviation industry unwillingly facilitated the spread of COVID-19 (Nakamura and Managi 2020; Sokadjo and Atchadé 2020; Zhang et al 2020;and Coelho et al 2020) and subsequently was hit by an immense economic recession, interest in a more "resilient" approach gained popularity throughout the sector (Tuchen et al 2020;ICAO 2020;Terry 2020;Gössling 2020;Lenot and Stewart 2020;Arora et al 2021;and Bouwer et al 2022). Preparing for future public health disruptions thus has a clear societal and economic value.…”

Section: Discussion and Limitationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic, the need for creating a "resilience" strategy significantly increased within the civil aviation industry (Tuchen et al 2020;ICAO 2020;Terry 2020;Gössling 2020;Lenot and Stewart 2020;Arora et al 2021;and Bouwer et al 2022). As the civil aviation industry is arguably one of the hardest-hit industries by the pandemic and instrumental in the spread of COVID-19 (Nakamura and Managi 2020;Sokadjo and Atchadé 2020;Zhang et al 2020;and Coelho et al 2020) the value of being more resilient is becoming apparent.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

A Categorization of Resilience: A Scoping Review

Nieuwborg

Mastrigt

Melles

et al. 2023

Administrative Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The COVID-19 pandemic exposed the existential public health and economic fragilities of the civil aviation industry. To prevent future public health disruptions, the civil aviation industry is gaining interest in becoming more “resilient” but rarely elaborates on its meaning, hampering decision-making and strategy development. When looking into the academic literature it seems that a proliferation of resilience-related concepts occurred. Although enriching resilience, it also dilutes its meaning and reduces its use for practice. This paper aims to create concept clarity regarding resilience by proposing a categorization of resilience. Based upon a scoping review, this categorization dissects resilience into four reoccurring aspects: fragility, robustness, adaptation, and transformation. This categorization is expected to support sensemaking in disruptive times while assisting decision-making and strategy development on resilience. When applying this categorization in the civil aviation and public health context, the transformative aspect seems underused. Further research will focus on maturing the categorization of resilience and its use as a sensemaking tool.

show abstract