2009
DOI: 10.1080/02699930802264895
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Empathic forecasting: How do we predict other people's feelings?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
(57 reference statements)
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Collectivistic oriented cultures, such as the Portuguese (Hofstede, 2001), show more emotion-focused coping and joint DC than cultures with a more individualistic orientation (Vedes et al, 2016). Possible mechanisms of the positive effect of perceived similarity in relationships include feeling understood and validated and signaling that the partner understands the self and that he/she is not alone (e.g., Pollmann & Finkenauer, 2009). In this study, however, we could not examine which mechanisms accounted for the relationship between shared appraisals and marital adjustment, which would be an important research question to explore in future studies.…”
Section: Developing Shared Appraisalsmentioning
confidence: 48%
“…Collectivistic oriented cultures, such as the Portuguese (Hofstede, 2001), show more emotion-focused coping and joint DC than cultures with a more individualistic orientation (Vedes et al, 2016). Possible mechanisms of the positive effect of perceived similarity in relationships include feeling understood and validated and signaling that the partner understands the self and that he/she is not alone (e.g., Pollmann & Finkenauer, 2009). In this study, however, we could not examine which mechanisms accounted for the relationship between shared appraisals and marital adjustment, which would be an important research question to explore in future studies.…”
Section: Developing Shared Appraisalsmentioning
confidence: 48%
“…These possibilities of entrenched beliefs are particularly likely because, in general, right-leaners anchor particularly heavily on their own beliefs as a way of imposing their desired additional structure on the world (Stern and West 2016), a social projection that typically exacerbates insensitivity to new information (Amit, Roccas, and Meidan 2010; Pollmann and Finkenauer 2009). 2 Whereas other groups are likelier to converge to consensus beliefs, then, intrinisic cognitive and psychological factors may leave right-leaners confident in their own, distinctive analysis.…”
Section: Ideology and Nonstandard Perceptionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…clinicians for patients). However, other work suggests that people predict that health conditions such as diabetes, epilepsy and haemophilia will more adversely impact their own lives than the lives of others ; and yet other work suggests that impact biases for self and other predictions are of similar magnitude. On the whole this research suggests that the impact bias is, at the very least, operative when making forecasts about the impact of aversive events on others' lives; clinicians may be subject to such empathic forecasting biases when considering how others will respond to the outcomes of predictive tests.…”
Section: Forecasting Biases In Predictive Genetic Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%