Empathic responding in preschool‐aged children with familial risk for autism

Abstract

Individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) show deficits in social and emotional reciprocity, which often include empathic responding. The younger siblings of children with ASD (high-risk siblings) are at elevated risk for ASD and for subclinical deficits in social-emotional functioning. Higher levels of empathy in high-risk siblings during the second and third years of life predict fewer ASD symptoms and likelihood of diagnosis. We conducted a multi-method investigation of empathic responding to an examiner’s accident in 30 low-risk and 48 high-risk siblings with (n=12) and without ASD outcomes (n=36) at 4–6 years of age. Empathic responding was measured through behavioral observation and parent report. Prosocial behavior did not differ by ASD outcome. Children with ASD exhibited lower levels of personal distress than high-risk and low-risk siblings without ASD. Per parent report, high-risk siblings without ASD demonstrated higher levels of empathic responding than low-risk children, while the ASD group did not differ from children without ASD on this measure. Higher levels of observed empathic concern, but not prosocial behavior, were associated with lower Social Affect scores on the ADOS in high-risk children. Results suggest that ASD diagnosis and symptoms are associated with reduced emotional responsiveness to an adult’s distress, but not associated with deficits in prosocial behavior at preschool age. Results do not support the idea that empathic responding is negatively impacted in a broader autism phenotype. Findings extend previous research by suggesting that empathy may be a protective factor in the social-emotional development of children with familial risk for ASD. Lay summary We examined empathic responding to an adult’s accident in children with and without familial risk for ASD at 4–6 years of age. Results suggest that ASD diagnosis and symptoms are associated with reduced emotional responsiveness to an adult’s distress, but not with deficits in helping behavior at preschool age. Findings do not support the idea that deficits in empathic responding are part of a broader autism phenotype.

Quantity and quality of empathic responding by autistic and non-autistic adolescent girls and boys

“…Specifically, when an adult was in pain, autistic individuals usually showed less visible emotional arousal than their non-autistic peers (Butean et al, 2014; Campbell et al, 2017; McDonald & Messinger, 2012). The exception to this is a study by McDonald and colleagues (2017), where although the difference between groups was not significant, a trend in the same direction was present. When an experimenter expressed distress about losing his/ her watch however, autistic (pre-)adolescents showed as much visible emotional arousal as their non-autistic peers (Newbigin et al, 2016).…”

“…Such studies provide us with an understanding of more real-life social responses in various contexts, when compared to the use of imaged or videos. Examples of stimuli include an adult hurting him/ herself or being in pain (Butean et al, 2014; Campbell et al, 2017; McDonald et al, 2017; McDonald & Messinger, 2012), receiving bad news (Scheeren et al, 2013), losing her watch/torn drawing (Newbigin et al, 2016), or a peer being excluded from an online ball game (Deschamps et al, 2014). By observing and scoring participant’s visible responses in the video recordings, these studies examine the level of attention to the event, the visible emotional arousal (i.e.…”

A telehealth approach to improving clinical trial access for infants with tuberous sclerosis complex

“…Moreover, because TSC is often diagnosed in utero [11,12], these infants can be monitored for signs of atypical development well before a clinical ASD diagnosis is made. In a previous longitudinal study of early development, we found that infants with TSC who developed ASD demonstrated marked social communication and nonverbal cognitive delays by age 12 months [13,14], with deficits in nonverbal communication skills such as eye contact, coordination of gaze, engagement, and social referencing. Despite these clear behavioral markers of atypical development in early infancy, most infants in this study were not receiving targeted social communication interventions, with therapeutic effort focused instead on global development (such as physical therapy to address delayed motor skills).…”

What are Replicable Aspects of the Broader Autism Phenotype among College Students?

“…A study using a well-validated, behavioral measure of prosocial behavior revealed that autistic children exhibited similar levels of prosocial behavior to nonautistic children (Deschamps, Been, & Matthys, 2014). A study using another behavioral measure of prosocial behavior also revealed no differences in prosocial behavior between autistic and non-autistic children (McDonald, Murphy, & Messinger, 2017).…”