1997
DOI: 10.1521/jscp.1997.16.3.299
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Empathic Weeping, Social Communication, and Cognitive Dissonance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Third, our non-systematic literature review shows that the effect of self-reported intentions in response to hypothetical scenarios is rather strong. Similarly, the reviewed studies that focused on more behavioral measures such as subliminally presented stimuli or approach/avoidance movements (Balsters et al, 2013) or studies presenting real crying individuals (Hill & Martin, 1997) have found comparable effects with respect to the studies focusing on self-reported support intentions. Another key reason is that reports on support intentions are cost-effective and allow us to measure support without using for example deception across many different samples.…”
Section: Social Context and Perceived Appropriateness Little Consistenmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Third, our non-systematic literature review shows that the effect of self-reported intentions in response to hypothetical scenarios is rather strong. Similarly, the reviewed studies that focused on more behavioral measures such as subliminally presented stimuli or approach/avoidance movements (Balsters et al, 2013) or studies presenting real crying individuals (Hill & Martin, 1997) have found comparable effects with respect to the studies focusing on self-reported support intentions. Another key reason is that reports on support intentions are cost-effective and allow us to measure support without using for example deception across many different samples.…”
Section: Social Context and Perceived Appropriateness Little Consistenmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Because the main function of crying is to stimulate others to help remove a certain source of discomfort (e.g., Frijda, 1997;Kottler & Montgomery, 2001;Vingerhoets et al, 2000), we hypothesized that people are more likely to help and support a crying person in unpleasant situations than in pleasant situations. We also theorized that crying in pleasant situations may be perceived as less appropriate than is crying in unpleasant situations, leading to more negative reactions from the social environment (Frijda, 1997;Hill & Martin, 1997;Nelson, 2000). Nelson (2005) suggested that crying is more likely in the presence of family and friends than in the company of strangers.…”
Section: Valence Of Situationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, although the prevalences vary dramatically, extreme low mood is observed in most, if not all, cultures (Hill and Martin, 1997;Howell, 1979;Andrade et al, 2003;Weissman et al, 1996). Second, a reanalysis of Brown and Harris' (1978) original data suggested that severe enough situations cause severe low mood (depression) in almost anyone (Monroe and Simons, 1991).…”
Section: Evolution and Subtypes Of Low Moodmentioning
confidence: 99%