1997
DOI: 10.4064/-38-1-325-338
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Empathy theory and the Laplace transform

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The evolution from an initial state in Y to a solution in the space X is generated by the operator pair −A B → Y × Y , which is called the generating pair of the double family S t Y → X t > 0 , E t Y → Y t > 0 whenever S t y solves Pr AEP . The characterization of generators of such double families of evolution operators may be found in [30,31]. It is evident that the semigroup E t is determined by the operators A and B in a unique way and that there exists a unique bounded linear operator C Y → X such that S t = CE t .…”
Section: Pr (Aep)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The evolution from an initial state in Y to a solution in the space X is generated by the operator pair −A B → Y × Y , which is called the generating pair of the double family S t Y → X t > 0 , E t Y → Y t > 0 whenever S t y solves Pr AEP . The characterization of generators of such double families of evolution operators may be found in [30,31]. It is evident that the semigroup E t is determined by the operators A and B in a unique way and that there exists a unique bounded linear operator C Y → X such that S t = CE t .…”
Section: Pr (Aep)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this appendix, we list definitions and results from the theory of double families of evolution operators (empathy theory), as developed by Sauer in [29][30][31], which are important in this study. We recall (Section 1.3) that the concept of double families of evolution operators was developed with the aim of treating implicit evolution equations of the form Find U such that…”
Section: Appendixmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been shown [11] that for the study of implicit evolution equations, 'double families' of evolution operators play a role similar to that of semigroups. In this approach cause and effect are described in different Banach spaces Y (cause) and X (effect).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For partial differential equations with dynamic boundary conditions it may easily happen that B is not closable [16]. In order to cover a wider range of situations a dynamic systems approach to implicit evolution equations was developed [10,11]. The theory is based on double families of evolution operators and the empathy relation mentioned above.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally we note that, as in our study of a non-linear thermo-elastic Euler-Bernoulli beam-rigid body structure with rotational inertia, an analytic evolution operator is here, in the absence of thermal e ects in the structure, not attainable. Hence the theory of double families of evolution operators developed by Sauer [25], which has particular advantages in the analytic case (see e.g. Reference [18]), will not be employed in this study.…”
Section: Riessner-mindlin Plate-timoshenko Beam Hybrid Structurementioning
confidence: 99%